Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Slaw.ca
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Research
: Slaw.caB.C. Provincial Court Policy on Live Coverage of Trials
By Simon Fodden
The Office of the Chief Judge of the Provincial Court of British Columbia recently released a policy statement [PDF] regarding public and media access. A few sections of the policy are directed at using computers and other digital devices to transmit information during proceedings:
e. Computers
Members of the public and the media are permitted to use portable computers in Provincial Court provided that they do not disturb the proceedings or interfere with the operation of the court?s own electronic equipment, and that the computers are used solely for the purpose of note-taking.f. Cell phones, personal digital assistants (PDA?s) or data transmission devices
Members of the public and the media may take cellular phones, PDA?s or other devices with a broadcasting or transmission function with them into courtrooms provided that the data transmission function is disabled. The quality of the courtroom digital recording and audio systems can be compromised by data transmission and thus all such data transmission functions must be turned off.
Does anyone have evidence that the use of a computer or smart phone, for example, to send text via a 3G connection might in fact “compromise” courtroom devices? The Wikipedia article on the use of cell phones on aircraft seems to conclude that there is little if any hard evidence that cell phone use could affect a plane’s systems. I’d be interested to learn whether the Provincial Court ran any tests to see what effects data transmission would have. What this policy requires is not simply that cell phones be set to silent but that they be put in “airplane” mode and thus disconnected from any network. I wonder, too, whether this will be explained and enforced.
Full post as published by Slaw.ca on February 22, 2011 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Wind and Hail Coverage
Allstate Corp. agrees to restore insurance coverage and pay $250,000 settlement.
Institutionalized Medicaid Recipients
Sue For Right To Choose Where They Live
Microsoft Corp.
allegedly failed to provide adequate access and service to Xbox Live and its subscribers.
State Farm Class Actions
Policy Holders Settle
Wal-Mart
Faces Class Action over Return Policy
Florida Medicaid
Limiting Coverage of Drugs for Kids

TV Pilot Project Approved for Federal Civil Trials
Criminal prosecution under the IRPA
Spottswood on Live Hearings, Paper Trials
Live coverage of Sotomayor hearings
Broadcasting of federal court trials hits a snag
Bringing Trials to your Desktop








