ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The Gavel

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: The Gavel

States Chipping Away at Merit Selection?

By Peter Hardin

ADVERTISEMENTS

Attacks on merit selection of judges have advanced in legislatures in Oklahoma and Arizona. Nationwide, merit selection is getting an unusual level of attention in state capitols.

In Oklahoma, the state Senate passed a resolution that would eliminate the Judicial Nominating Commission, which recommends candidates for the bench to the governor. The legislation also would require Senate confirmation of judicial picks.

In Arizona, the state Senate approved a measure that would end retention elections and require Senate confirmation of judges selected by the governor; it would revise judicial nominating commission membership but not eliminate the screening panels.

“Merit selection has been the focus of an exceptionally large number of bills this legislative year,” reported the Gavel to Gavel blog of the National Center for State Courts, saying the “scope of the bills range from tweaks, to modifications, to outright abandonment of merit selection.”

Democratic state Sen. Charlie Laster warned the Oklahoma bill ?would inject politics into selection of judges,? according to a Tulsa World article.

?All you have to do is look at what goes on in Washington, D.C., and see how partisan and political the confirmation of a judge process is,” he said.

Republican Sen. Clark Jolley, the legislation’s sponsor, said the way the Judicial Nominating Commission is structured, “You have the judiciary picking the judiciary and the executive having very little control regarding who is selected.”

In Florida, a House subcommittee voted to advanced a proposed constitutional amendment to require Supreme Court and appeals judges to capture 60 percent support from voters to stay on the bench after a term expires, the Orlando Sentinel reported.

From earlier Gavel Grab posts you can learn more about the legislation in Oklahoma by clicking here, in Arizona by clicking here and in Florida by clicking here. The National Center for State Courts is a partner of Justice at Stake.

Full post as published by The Gavel on March 10, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0134 secs (new cache)