Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Public Defense Blogs -> Kansas Defenders
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Public Defense
: Kansas DefendersDate of prior controls person/nonperson decision
Our Supreme Court has recently resolved this question in State v. Williams. No. 98,667 (Kan. 2010): "In designating these [out-of-state] crimes as person or nonperson, the comparagle offeses in Kansas shall be determined as of the date the defendant committed the out-of-state crimes." This promotes the standard principle that the punishment for an offense is fixed as of the date the offense was committed.McKinney's Oklahoma conviction for failing to register as a sex offender was a felony under Oklahoma law. But the comparable offense in Kansas was a nonperson felony in 2002. So the district court was wrong when it classified McKinney's Oklahoma conviction as a person felony for the purpose of calculating McKinney's criminal-history score.
This is a nice example of how a case can be in the "zone of victory." We lost the Williams case, but it is likely to have a pretty positive impact on lots of other defendants.
The question we have been asking is: how do you classify pre-1993 out-of-state convictions? Becuase there were no person/nonperson felonies at that time. We (and some other attorneys around the state) have been arguing that, under Williams, all pre-1993 out-of-state convictions should be classified as non-person.
[Update: the state did not file a PR and the mandate issued on January 21, 2011.]
Full post as published by Kansas Defenders on January 22, 2011 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Oklahoma Bacterial Outbreak
One Person Dead, 14 Hospitalized
$1.5 Million Asbestos Mesothelioma Verdict Against Fisher Controls International
$1.5 Million Asbestos Mesothelioma Verdict

Cal Thomas: Corporations have rights, but do the unborn
Federal Circuit Extends the Scope of 102(e) "Secret Prior Art"
Swedish Bankruptcy Law Creditors Set-off Rights
China Launches Strict New Internet Controls It Says Are Aimed At Eliminating Online Porn
BPAI: 102(e) art can be effective prior art as of provisional priority date
Parental controls help guard against sexting








