ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

After Ninth Circuit Ruling, Same-Sex Marriage in Calif. Stays on Ice

By Ashby Jones

ADVERTISEMENTS

For a while there, the plaintiffs in the Proposition 8 case seemed to have all the momentum.

Last August, they won a blistering ruling from a lower-court judge that the measure, which bans same-sex marriage in California, is unconstitutional. And it certainly looked like they got a good draw with the makeup of the three-judge appellate panel who got the case next.

But then, the momentum slowed, most notably when the Ninth Circuit kicked the case to the California Supreme Court for clarification on a procedural issue.

On Wednesday, it slowed even more when the Ninth Circuit refused to let same-sex marriages resume in California while it considers the case. Click here for the San Francisco Chronicle story.

Plaintiffs had asked the Ninth Circuit to lift its suspension of Judge Vaughn Walker’s 2010 ruling while it considered the appeal. But in a one-sentence order, the three judges on the panel said they had reviewed the arguments and decided simply to “deny plaintiffs’ motion at this time.” The judges are Stephen Reinhardt, Michael Hawkins and N. Randy Smith.

The American Foundation for Equal Rights, which represents the plaintiffs, expressed disappointment.

“It is decidedly unjust and unreasonable to expect California’s gay and lesbian couples to put their lives on hold and suffer daily discrimination as second-class citizens while their U.S. District Court victory comes to its final conclusion,” Chad Griffin, the group’s chairman, said in a statement.

Prop. 8′s sponsors, a conservative religious coalition called Protect Marriage, said the court’s order avoids “the unnecessary confusion that would come from another brief legalization of same-sex marriage.”

“This decision is a victory for both Prop. 8 supporters and for the initiative process itself,” said the group’s lawyer, Andrew Pugno.


Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on March 23, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0132 secs (new cache)