Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Food Liability Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Food Liability Law BlogForum For Water Users In Napa County
By Kenneth Odza
This blog entry was originally written by Jake Storms from the California Environmental Law Blog.
The Napa County Farm Bureau held its first water forum in five or six years on March 9, in St. Helena, California. Kicked off by Bureau President Jim Lincoln, the event was well attended, with over 100 concerned stakeholders listening to the most recent updates in California water issues.
Phillip Miller, the Deputy Director of Napa County Public Works, discussed a recent study by the County designed to compile countywide data, establish a framework for reporting, and provide recommendations related to any future groundwater permitting and monitoring program.
Of most interest was the presentation by Paula Whealen, a principal at the engineering firm of Wagner & Bonsignore. Ms. Whealen gave a general overview of new requirements for surface water users from the California State Water Resources Control Board ('SWRCB'), including:
- All reports of licensees and progress reports by permittees and pre-1914 water right diverters are now due annually by July 1;
- Reports must provide the monthly amount taken from the source;
- They must state the monthly amount beneficially used;
- They must be filed electronically as of this year; and
- Filings will require high-speed internet access.
Because all new reports must be filed electronically, the prior 'fudge factor' regarding timelines for reporting will no longer exist. The SWRCB will be able to tell on July 2 who hasn't filed the necessary reports. Failure to file all necessary reports constitutes non-compliance with the underlying water license/permit and can lead to fines and/or other administrative actions. It was also stated that, given the increase in the number of enforcement officers (25) and the establishment of a water rights enforcement office in Santa Rosa, California, there will be a significant increase in site inspections in the North Coast region.
A bit of sage advice to be taken from the Forum is for all vineyard and winery owners operating under a license/permit to take it out, read it, and understand it. If you don't understand your water right permit, find someone who does, and most importantly, make sure you are in compliance. In addition, even for those sources that are not required to be reported (i.e., reclaimed water), it behooves vineyards and wineries to keep records of all water that is used on the property.
Full post as published by Food Liability Law Blog on March 23, 2011 (boomark / email).
Clean Water Act
Lexington-Fayette County agrees to spend $250 million to fix its sanitary and storm sewer systems.
Restaurant Staff
Win Lawsuit Suit Against Employer for Infiltrating their MySpace Forum
Veolia Water
allegedly overestimated water usage for residential customers.
FenPhen
Serious Heart Problems Found In Ex-Users
Tollway I-Pass
alleging that users were sent erroneous fines
Chocolate Discharge
G.K.I. Foods agrees to $43,000 settlement after disposing production waste water into a sanitary waste water system.

Foreclosure Scams Growing, Continue Hitting Northern California
Brother Cops Plea To Screwing Siblings Out Of $200K Of Equity In Home Inherited From Deceased Mom
Napa County move to VBM raises interesting accessibility issues
Controversy Over Vineyard Development in Napa
Man pleads not guilty in security guard murder www.privateofficer.com
Napa High teacher sent to jail for sexting student www.privateofficer.com







