Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Miscellaneous Blogs -> Outside Counsel
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Miscellaneous
: Outside CounselBy Bill Altreuter
ADVERTISEMENTS
There was a statutory basis for Roosevelt's action, which distinguishes it from Truman's seizing the steel mills, but there is nevertheless an interesting Constitutional issue here. The Supreme Court based its decision in Youngstown Sheet Metal and Tube, in part, because Congress had not authorized Truman's action. This leaves open the question of whether Congress could authorize the President to so act. As it happens FDR's action was politically unpopular, and two weeks after Montgomery Ward was seized the government relinquished control. It's interesting to consider whether adherence to norms would work the same way today.
Full post as published by Outside Counsel on April 28, 2020 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.








