Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Race to the BottomThe Director Compensation Project: Sprint Nextel
By Ryan Miller
This post is part of an ongoing series that examines the way stock exchange independence rules influence director compensation. We are including companies from 2007’s Fortune 100 and using information disclosed in each company’s 2008 proxy statements. In addition to state standards and the requirements of SOX, the stock exchanges have each adopted their own standards for director independence. Meeting stock exchange requirements is mandatory for most listed companies.
Under NYSE Rule 303A.01, all listed companies must have a majority of independent directors sitting on their boards. Directors are not independent if they received over $100,000 in direct compensation, other than director’s fees, in any one year period over the last three years pursuant to Rule 303A.02(b)(ii). This is a looser restriction than the equivalent NASDAQ Rule, 4200(a)(15), which includes all compensation. Rule 303A.06 requires that, in addition to the general independence standards, audit committee members must comport with the requirements of Exchange Act Rule 10A-3 (C.F.R. §240.10A-3), also known as SOX 301.
One can see some of the effects of these rules when looking at the director compensation table from Sprint Nextel’s (S-NYSE) 2008 Proxy Statement. According to the proxy statement, directors were paid the following amounts:
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | Stock Awards | Option Awards | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation and Earnings | Total |
| Keith J. Bane | 127,000 | 107,771 | — | — | — | 240,836 |
| Robert R. Bennett | 148,000 | 138,662 | — | — | — | 286,662 |
| Gordon M. Bethune | 109,000 | 135,852 | — | — | — | 245,065 |
| Frank M. Drendel | 102,000 | 107,771 | — | — | — | 210,312 |
| Larry C. Glasscock | 46,167 | 32,685 | — | — | — | 78,852 |
| James H. Hance, Jr. | 164,625 | 161,730 | — | — | — | 330,535 |
| V. Janet Hill | 128,000 | 107,771 | — | — | — | 236,260 |
| Irvine O. Hockaday, Jr. | 202,375 | 134,078 | — | — | — | 341,956 |
| Linda Koch Lorimer | 117,000 | 134,078 | — | — | — | 251,552 |
| Rodney O’Neal | 45,167 | 32,685 | — | — | — | 77,852 |
| William H. Swanson | 156,000 | 131,974 | — | — | — | 288,454 |
Director Compensation: Last year, the board for Sprint Nextel held six regular meetings and fourteen special meetings. All directors attended at least 75% of board meetings. The eleven directors averaged $235,303 in compensation. Since Mr. Glasscock and Mr. O’Neal joined the board on August 7, 2007, they earned significantly less than the other nine directors.
Director Tenure: The outside directors have served for an average of 4.5 years. Linda Lorimer is the longest serving board member, having been on Sprint’s board since March, 1993. Several long-standing Nextel Communications board members joined the Sprint Nextel Board in 2005, when the companies merged.
CEO Compensation: Sprint Nextel’s CEO for most of 2007 was Gary D. Forsee. He was replaced in December by Daniel R. Hesse. Forsee’s total compensation for 2007 was $40,006,629. His base salary was $1,529,915 (3.8% of total compensation), with $23,439,623 (58.5%) from stock and option awards. According to the proxy statement, Forsee did not receive a bonus; however, his non-equity incentive plan, pension plan, and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings totaled $6,739,985 (16.8%). Finally, other compensation totaled $8,297,106 (20.7%). Mr. Forsee had $89,516 of income from personal use of the corporate aircraft and had $4,679 worth of home security equipment and services.
Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on April 30, 2008 (boomark / email).
Workers Compensation Overview
Federal laws that cover workplace injuries
Sprint Nextel
alleging violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Sprint Nextel
Early Termination Fees Ruled Illegal in California
Sprint-Nextel
Sued for $1 Billion Plus in Federal Class Action
Sprint Nextel Corp.
allegedly defrauded wireless customers by charging unspecified roaming fees.
Sprint Nextel, T-Mobile, Verizon and Alltel
allegedly charging customers for unauthorized mobile content
Investor Fraud
Company president and director Gregory William Rivers to pay $10,000 shareholder fraud settlement.

No Personal Jurisdiction for Patent Case Against Sprint Nextel
Why Wireless is Crucial to Cable's Competitive Future
Sprint Hits the Growth Skids...4,000 Jobs Cut
Both Sprint and Clearwire Post Weak Q1 Reports
Sprint Ordered To Refund Early Termination Fees to Customers
Attorney Jay Edelson on New Technology Class Action








