Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

Litigation

: How Appealing

"Technological advances in recent years have been such that an untrained eye simply cannot easily distinguish a photograph of a real person from a virtual image by merely eyeballing the photographs in question."

"Technological advances in recent years have been such that an untrained eye simply cannot easily distinguish a photograph of a real person from a virtual image by merely eyeballing the photographs in question." Today, Senior First Circuit Judge Norman H. Stahl has issued an opinion concurring in the judgment criticizing as improperly lax the manner in which federal prosecutors can satisfy the requirement in a child pornography prosecution of proving that the children depicted in the images are real.

Full post as published by How Appealing on May 12, 2008 (boomark / email).