ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Support Blogs -> Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation Support

: Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence

LAWYER SNOOP RECEIVES TWO YEAR SUSPENSION

ADVERTISEMENTS

On May 23d, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals May 23 suspended Michael P. Markins from the practice of law for two years after he broke into his wife?s law firm computer system while looking for evidence that his wife was being unfaithful. See details in a former post: http://ridethelightning.senseient.com/2008/03/electronic-peep.html

In a per curiam opinion, the court conditioned reinstatement on the lawyer's taking an extra 12 hours of continuing legal education in ethics (gee, do you think?) and said he must also submit to one year of formal supervision once he resumes practicing.   

Markins admitted the offenses but argued that the recommended sanction was too harsh in light of his extreme emotional distress over his wife's suspected infidelity, his lack of criminal intent, the absence of harm to his or any other clients, and the fact that he never divulged any confidential information. He further stated that he was remorseful, had no discipline history, was highly regarded by his peers, had cooperated fully, and had already suffered significant financial losses.   

In its decision, the court noted Markins did not stop spying until his wife's law firm expended significant time and money investigating who had breached their e-mail security. Moreover, it added, the firm was forced to disclose the breaches to its clients, exposing itself to potential lawsuits and professional embarrassment.  The court also noted that the story had appeared in a local newspaper and that one client had already put the firm on notice of a potential claim for damages.

A cautionary tale indeed. The court is to be commended for making sure this kind of criminal and unethical conduct by a lawyer was dealt with harshly, lest there be more miscreants thinking they can ?take a walk? on this sort of unethical behavior.

Hat tip to Tina Ayiotis for passing this along.

E-mail: snelson@senseient.com      Phone: 703-359-0700

Full post as published by Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence on June 13, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0033 secs (from cache 10/31/26 21:40:19)