Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Althouse
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: Althouse"Temporary ban has been lifted due to fantastic photo."
There are many things to talk about at the link, but I want to say something about those baby holders, the ones that face the baby forward, so that it protrudes off the chest like a vestigial conjoined twin. Think: Kuato:
Wait. I have a comment I want to make, but looking for some Kuato video, I discovered a whole Kuato genre. There's this. And this. You get the idea. But back to babies...
Scary!
But I want to protect babies. I feel the instinctive need to protect babies. Even when they remind me of Kuato. Every time I see someone carrying their baby like that I worry about them falling. Adults don't fall that often, but we do trip now and then. Maybe once a year. And sometimes an idiot runs square into us or flings open a door when we're traipsing by. The baby's entire face is exposed! I'm sorry. I don't like thinking about this, but how can you walk around like that and not worry about accidents?
Now, apparently, men prefer the facing forward baby carrier. Why is that? Does it seem too intimate having the baby's body in that position? Are men more into exploration and discovery? Which position does the baby prefer? Of course, the baby has no basis for visualizing the grownup taking a header.
I'm not saying the government should take your baby away, but could you please stop carrying it like that?
Full post as published by Althouse on June 13, 2008 (boomark / email).

Fantastic Picture: Atari user's desk, circa 1983 [Digg]
"Gag order lifted in part" against law blog
Lawyer for ex-transit officer wants temporary gag order lifted
Harvard Law Faculty Commits to Open Access to Scholarship







