Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Chris King's 1st Amendment Page
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Constitutional Law
: Chris King's 1st Amendment PageKingCast goes to Judge Vaughn with ongoing RSA 91-A malfeasance from Franconia Defendants.
By Christopher King
Dear Attorney Mullen: If I don't see an email from you on this by 3pm today I will file this with the Court in a Word Document Motion.On 15 June 2008 Petitioner emailed Attorney Mullen regarding his clients' obligations pursuant to RSA 91-A as noted:
Dear Dan:
I know you have five (5) children and I want you to rock out with them today and enjoy your fatherhood.
But tomorrow I want you to notify me on the status of my outstanding RSA 91-A requests. I wrote you back on 22 May 2008 and you responded indicating that things were coming soon. Then I reminded you on 2 June 2008. It is now 15 June and still no word. I've been patient. Please advise.
********
But he has not advised and as you can see from the itemized attachment he indicated things should have been ready for production. This is an ongoing pattern that predates to them allegedly not knowing the context for the Troy Watts Bruce McKay ethics complaint in spite of the fact that Petitioner gave them a copy of the Troy Watt's email on the matter nearly a year ago. He captioned said email "Franconia, Fear & Loathing" and in it he wrote:
"I wrote a long letter of grievance to both the Chief [and Prosecutor Hiliare, who provided his copy immediately on request]."
Again Your Honor this goes to the Contempt of Court issue as well as apportionment of Court Costs to be assessed to Defendants jointly and severally.
Respectfully submitted/CK on behalf of KingCast.net.
Full post as published by Chris King's 1st Amendment Page on June 18, 2008 (boomark / email).
Baltimore Strip Search Class Action
Judge Gives Go-ahead
Canceled Insurance
Judge orders Health Net Inc. to pay $9 million settlement after terminating a policyholder's policy after being diagnosed with breast cancer.
Labor and Delivery
Judge awards mother $6 million medical malpractice settlement after baby was born with brain injuries.

Sealed Penalty Phase Verdict Returned as to One of Two Defendants in Capital Case
Garcia-Aguilar v. United States District Court (9th Cir. - Aug. 6, 2008)








