Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Religion Clause

Religion & Law

: Religion Clause

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

By Howard M. Friedman

In Meyer v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46639 (WD WI, June 13, 2008), a Wisconsin federal district court stayed a decision on whether a prisoner could proceed with a RUIPA claim while he supplements his complaint to identify his religion, the religious item he claims to have been denied, and its relationship to his religious practice.

In Harvey v. Adams County Sheriff's Office, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46390 (D CO, June 4, 2008), a Colorado federal magistrate judge ruled that a material factual dispute exists over whether an institution's vegetarian diet met a Muslim prisoner's religious needs. He also found that defendants did not show it was reasonable to deny Muslim inmates access to the institution's kosher diet-- in the absence of available Halal food. Plaintiff's rights under the 1st Amendment, RLUIPA and the equal protection clause were not violated, however, when officials failed to provide him a copy of Hadith -- a religious book or hold Muslim religious services.

In Tafari v. Annetts, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45901 (SDNY, June 12, 2008), a New York federal district court granted summary judgment to defendants in a case in which a prisoner asserted violations of his rights when he was denied kosher meals on four occasions during his transfer between institutions. The court also rejected his claim that his request to transfer institutions was denied on racial grounds.

In Sacred Feather v. Merrill, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47544 (D ME, June 19, 2008), a Maine federal magistrate judge, after having earlier dismissed some of plaintiffs' claims for failure to exhaust administrative remedies (2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47543), recommended that summary judgment be entered for defendant on claims by Native American prisoners regarding a shelter for their ceremonies, the right to have pow wows and feasts, the availability of a sweat lodge, and an entitlement to more funding. Much of the opinion criticizes counsel on both sides for their scanty presentation of facts and legal arguments.

Full post as published by Religion Clause on June 24, 2008 (boomark / email).