Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

Constitutional Law

: Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

KingCast schools a tool on GSR as he explains why RSA 611-B:21 is Unconstitutionally overbroad in the Franconia shooting tragedy.

By Christopher King

So in the last post I told Kelly Ayotte why she is being sued, so that the matter can be settled in the Supreme Court. See, as of not, a citizen has no way of knowing if Bruce McKay fired his gun or not, because if we take Gregory W. Floyd at his word Bruce McKay most definitely DID fire his gun, but there's nothing in Kelly's report on that. Nor of course is there any analysis of:

Liko Kenney's windshield.
McKenzie barn.
McKenzie window.

So anyway here's the point about Gunshot residue in this application:

PS: Funny as hell on GSR Bruce McKay was not in a room. He was outside, 15-20' away, which is all the reason why GSR -- admittedly in declining use these days -- is entirely appropriate in this situation.

Another reason GSR is not as much in vogue is because of DNA matching.

We don't have the DNA issues in this case other than the second magazine of Liko's gun which is probably slathered in Floyds. That's why Kelly allegedly never took fingerprints of Liko's gun even though it is a documented FACT that Floyd somehow went home with Liko's live round in his pocket.

We know who everybody was on 5/11.

What the elder "gentlemen" really did is all we don't know.

News you can use: New GSR techniques.

Full post as published by Chris King's 1st Amendment Page on August 06, 2008 (boomark / email).