ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Administrative Law Blogs -> Within the Scope

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Administrative Law

: Within the Scope

Election Reporting, Yes.? Although Not for the Truth of the Matter Asserted

By Eric L. Lipman

ADVERTISEMENTS
In an interesting opinion issued late last month, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit upheld a trial court?s exclusion, as inadmissible hearsay, certain election-related reports made by the Missouri Secretary of State?s office.

The U.S. Government had sued the State of Missouri, seeking orders that would compel the state to upgrade the processes by which it culls deceased and ineligible persons from Missouri's voter rolls.

Earlier, in 2005, as part of its preparation for a biennial report to Congress on election matters, the federal Election Assistance Commission sent survey forms to Missouri, requesting data regarding the performance of local election officials. When state officials sought an extension of the time to compile this data, the EAC ?denied Missouri?s request for an extension of time and told Missouri to do the best it could.?

When the federal government later sought to introduce these reports as evidence of Missouri's failure to meet federal election standards, the district court received the survey responses to demonstrate that Missouri had notice of possible election-related problems, but did not admit the responses for the truth of the matters asserted in the reports. The district court found that the statements about the performance of local election officials were hearsay. In its appeal, the United States challenged this ruling.

Sustaining the trial court?s limited use of the reports, the panel held that the state?s responses to the EAC survey did not qualify for an introduction as an admission of a party opponent, an adoptive admission, a public record or as a ?record of a regularly conducted activity? of the state.

The panel?s complete analysis ? including a worthwhile discussion of the Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution ? is accessible here.

Full post as published by Within the Scope on August 21, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0137 secs (new cache)