Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

Constitutional Law

: Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

NH AGs Kelly Ayotte and Jeffrey Strelzin still missing 43 seconds of 5/11 audio and they tell Nashua Telegraph to go to hell on Paulhus case.

By Christopher King

Cross-post: Nashua Telegraph forums. I?ll get to the Paulhus investigation in a minute, but first this RSA 91-A request that will be best understood once you read the 4 September 2008 letter from Strelzin to me that I will scan in the morning.

1. Per RSA 91-A, Kelly and Jeff, give me a copy of every letter you wrote to me regarding Rebecca Bell, right now. Enclosed please find my money order for $1 U.S. Dollar. Keep the change.
2. You refused to provide the missing 43 seconds of the Grafton Dispatch audio on 5/11, i.e 6:08:32 ? 6:09:15. I have the full disc that you provided me and if you had a way to tell me I was wrong, you would have done so. The U.S. House will find that most interesting.
3. The Jarvis case and the Concord cop-on-cop shooting, in which LE shot each other at 4:30 a.m. when they had no business being in the credit union raise troubling questions: Kelly already issued her advisory opinion on Jarvis recommending partial review, so she has thoroughly reviewed the matter. Why are you still withholding the RSA 91-A materials? As to the Concord shooting what is your timeframe on that? How complex could it be? A cop shot a cop where neither of them should have been. Are there drugs or alcohol involved like those clowns in Revere? Do tell. Why the holdup? You decided the Liko Kenney/Bruce McKay matter in a mere 24 hours, and you had a known multiple felon. i.e. Gregory W. Floyd involved with that case.
4. Ditto the Dion case. You won?t give me information on that but Karen Dion?s brother wrote me last week and said you all had made up your mind. The shooting happened nine (9) months ago. What are you waiting on, the Second Coming of Christ?
5. You tried to ignore the Michael Paulhus case by writing, ?Finally, this office has no documents which are responsive to your request regarding the Nashua PD case you referred to in your September, 4, 2008 e-mail.?

Are you trying to tell me that the paper lied when it wrote the following statements in this 16 October 2007 story:

"Ruling in the criminal case, Hillsborough County Superior Court Judge Bernard Hampsey found that police violated Paulhus' rights by questioning him without reading him his Miranda rights while he was in pain from having been shot and despite his desire to consult a lawyer; and by posing as investigators for the state attorney general's office."

The attorney general's office investigated but never issued a report on the incident.?

Per RSA 91-A give me any correspondence with the Nashua Telegraph, including requests for retractions or corrections, regarding the above paragraph. This is an ongoing request in perpetuity for the rest of your natural lives. You investigated anti-Mormon phone calls about Mitt Romney but you're telling me that you did not investigate the Nashua shooting? Please.

I will expose everything you do wrong for the rest of your lives as public officials, including your deviations from Homicide Protocol norms in Franconia. That is my Constitutional Right and Privilege and I?m going to fully enjoy it. Also, I just received my service returns from Grafton County on KingCast v. Martha McLeod et al, 08-E-192. I'll soon be serving you.

Very Truly Yours,

Christopher King, J.D./KingCast.net

Full post as published by Chris King's 1st Amendment Page on September 09, 2008 (boomark / email).