Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Estate Planning Blogs -> Toronto Estate Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Estate Planning
: Toronto Estate Law BlogInterest Not Payable on Insurance Proceeds Until Declaration of Death
By Hull & Hull LLP
Interest is normally paid on the proceeds of a policy of life insurance thirty days after the insurer receives sufficient evidence of the claim. The requirements are mandated by statute. What happens, however, where the insured “disappears”, and the beneficiary brings an application for a declaration of death? Is interest payable from the date of death (as declared by the court), or from the date of the declaration itself?
This issue was considered by the Court of Appeal of Manitoba in Antonation v. Sylvester, 2007 MBCA 110 (CanLII). There, the “deceased” disappeared on May 29, 1998. In May 2005, the beneficiary under a policy of insurance on the deceased’s life brought an application for a declaration that the deceased was presumed dead because of the passage of seven years from his disappearance. The court granted an Order on July 4, 2005 declaring that the deceased “shall be presumed to have died on May 29, 1998.”
The proceeds of the insurance policy were paid to the beneficiary within 30 days of the date that the court made the declaration: July 4, 2005. However, the beneficiary claimed interest from the date of disappearance (ie. the date of death as declared by the court: May 29, 1998).
The Court below and the Court of Appeal both held that no interest was payable until 30 days after the date upon which the declaration of death was made. This declaration was part of the “sufficient evidence” that the insurer required in order to trigger the obligation to pay under the applicable legislation. Until this declaration was made by the court, there was no obligation on the part of the insurer to make the payment.
The legislation in Ontario is essentially similar to the applicable Manitoba legislation considered by the court. In fact, the Court of Appeal of Manitoba relied on an Ontario Divisional Court case directly on point.
Thank you for reading.
Paul Trudelle
Full post as published by Toronto Estate Law Blog on December 20, 2007 (boomark / email).
Medicare
Guide to government health insurance for the elderly
National Practitioner Data Bank Fact
NPDB identifies unprofessional healthcare practitioners
Military Veterans Benefits
How to obtain full range of benefits for veterans and dependnets
US Federal Government
allegedly violated the niversal Declaration of Human Rights by deporting undocumented parents of US born children.
LINA - Cigna Life Insurance Company of North America Disability Claims
LINA Insurance alleging violations of disability insurance claims.
AARP Insurance
alleging misleading medical insurance policies.
Oxford Health Insurance
$50 million refunds offered in overcharged insurance suit.
Wrongful Death
alleging death was caused by the conduct of negligent defendant.
Taser Death
allegedly directly causing or leading to complications resulting in death.

Third DCA: Interest Awardable on WC Lien
Distribution of life insurance proceeds after convicted murderess acquitted on retrial
Cash Value of Surrendered Policy Not Exempt In Texas
Subrogation Rights in Legal Malpractice
Life Insurance Premium Financing
Kahn: Hedging the IRS - A Policy Justification for Excluding Liability and Tax Insurance Proceeds









