Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

Legal Research

: New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

New York Law Journal Featured Columnists September 30, 2008

By David Badertscher, PLL

<font size="1"> <p><font size="2">If you are already an online subscriber to the New York Law Journal you should be able to click on any of the links provided below, sign in, and access the full text of articles listed.</font></p> <p><a href="http://www.nylj.com" target="_blank"><font size="2">http://www.nylj.com</font></a></p> <p><font size="2">Subscription required for online access unless otherwise noted:</font></p> <p><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQDCCYQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVSS" target="_blank"><font size="2">Franchising</font></a><br/><font size="2">Tuesday, September 30, 2008<br/>By Rupert M. Barkoff<br/><br/> Rupert M. Barkoff, a partner at Kilpatrick Stockton, writes: A frustrated client recently asked me how to deal with a franchisee whose performance was questionable, for whatever reasons, but where franchise termination would be overkill. Two items seem to be the key factors in deciding what approach will be appropriate: the nature of the breach, and the character of the franchisee." </font></p> <p><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQDCCYQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVST" target="_blank"><font size="2">No-Fault Insurance Wrap-Up</font></a><br/><font size="2">Tuesday, September 30, 2008<br/>By David M. Barshay and Jill Lakin Schatz<br/><br/>"David M. Barshay, a partner at Baker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock and Neuwirth, and Jill Lakin Schatz, a solo practitioner, write that the Appellate Division, Second Department recently handed down a ground-breaking decision holding that that intentional accidents, while not covered under uninsured motorist provisions, are covered under no-fault insurance." </font></p> <p><font size="2">OUTSIDE COUNSEL: </font></p> <p><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQDCCYQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVSD" target="_blank"><font size="2">Insurance Policy Exclusions and Construction Projects</font></a><br/><font size="2">Tuesday, September 30, 2008<br/>By Kevin G. Faley and Anna J. Ervolina<br/><br/>"Kevin G. Faley, a partner at Morris Duffy Alonso & Faley, and Anna J. Ervolina, a senior associate at the firm, write that an insurance company's decision to deny coverage to its insured is not generally favored by the courts. However two recent decisions from the Second Department signify a change in the willingness to validate an denial of coverage. In each case, the insurance company successfully enforced a carefully worded exclusion contained in its policy which left contractors without insurance for a construction accident."</font></p> <p><font size="2">TECHNOLOGY TODAY:</font></p> <p><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQDCCYQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVTB" target="_blank"><font size="2"><font color="red">Free With Registration:</font> The Challenges in Mobile Computing</font></a><br/><font size="2">Tuesday, September 30, 2008<br/>By Steven C. Bennett and Cecilia R. Dickson<br/><br/>"Steven C. Bennett, a partner at Jones Day, and Cecilia R. Dickson, an associate at the firm, write that electronic discovery concerns need not present insurmountable problems for companies that foster mobile computing so long as certain unique issues are addressed head-on. Ineffective policies, with no recognition of the mobile computing environment, may exacerbate the difficulty and cost of satisfying e-discovery obligations." </font></p></font>

Full post as published by New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library on September 30, 2008 (boomark / email).