Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Institutional Shareholder Services -- Corporate Governance Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: Institutional Shareholder Services -- Corporate Governance BlogSurvey Finds Declining EEO-1 DisclosureSubmitted by: Peter DeSimone, Labor Standards Researcher
RiskMetrics Group, in coordination with the Sustainable Investment Research Analyst Network (SIRAN) and Walden Asset Management, today released the results from a second survey of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) disclosure among S&P 100 firms. A follow-up on a benchmark study from 2005, the second EEO survey suggests the disclosure rate among S&P 100 companies has diminished over the past two to three years.
The report finds companies that confirmed a policy to provide investors with comprehensive EEO-1 data, either in public reports or on request, decreased from 54 percent in 2005 to 36 percent of responding companies in 2007-8. While partial EEO data providers increased from 13 to 21 percent, those confirming that they do not disclose such information increased from 33 to 43 percent over the same period.
However, even these low reporting rates are likely overstated, as those electing not to participate?approximately half of S&P 100 companies?are assumed to be much less likely to disclose EEO information. Also, the companies surveyed are among the largest in the United States and have likely been under more scrutiny for their employment practices and pressure to disclose EEO-1 data than smaller firms.
There are several possible explanations for the precipitous fall in reporting rates. Shareholder pressure on this issue, in the form of resolutions filed during proxy season, has declined in recent years, as calls for broader global sustainability reporting?not aligned with U.S. EEO-disclosure requirements?have increased.
In addition, as of September 2007, the revised EEO-1 Report requires, among other changes, companies to separate the ?Officials and Managers? job classification into two levels based on responsibility and influence, ?Executive/Senior Level Officials and Managers? and ?First/Mid-Level Officials and Managers.? Therefore, given that employment disparities by race and gender tend to increase at higher management levels, companies may be more reluctant to share the EEO-1 Report.
You can access the full report by clicking here.
Full post as published by Institutional Shareholder Services -- Corporate Governance Blog on October 01, 2008 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
EB-1 and EB-2 Visa Status
Obtaining a Green Card Without Going Through the Labor Certification Process
Employee Lawsuits: Negligent Hiring and Retention
Employers must check references, criminal records, other background material.
Immigration Related Employment Discrimination & Unfair Labor Practices
What to do about employers who discriminate because of national origin
Bank Website Security
New Report Finds Widespread Flaws
California Labor Laws
alleged violations of California labor laws such as overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
Valero Energy
Faces National Labor Class Action
US Postal Service Workers
File Labor and Wages Class Action
Northwestern Mutual
Faces $200 Million Fair Labor Class Action

OCC Survey Finds Bank Underwriting Standards Tighten
Youths' Drug of Choice: Prescription
Labor Market Surveys and the Defense Base Act How your benefits can be reduced
Labor Market Survey May Be Done In Area Of Claimant's Residence Even If Out Of State
Conference on International Labor Standards, Rights and Beyond at Stanford








