ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Nothing is Certain But . . . Sarah Palin?s Wardrobe & Taxes?

By Dan Slater

ADVERTISEMENTS

palin3_art_200v_20081006093409.jpg

Alaska Governor, Sarah Palin, listens to questions during an interview in her office, Dec. 13, 2007. (AP Photo/Chris Miller, File)

Before we move on to the day’s more, um, pressing legal matters, let’s briefly discuss the sartorial fever generated by Sarah Palin’s clothing tabs. Heck, everyone else is.

For those of you who just got back from vacation, Politico reported yesterday that, since she was picked by John McCain in August, the Republican National Committee has spent more than $150,000 to clothe and accessorize veep candidate Sarah Palin and her family.

But when it comes to the merits of Valentino over Tahari, or the benefits of Cole Haan boots versus Kate Spade pumps, the Law Blog, we must admit, is pretty clueless. For the purposes of this post, we’ll also brush aside claims of sexism — would anyone bristle at a male candidate spending thousands on suits? — and get right down to that far sexier aspect of the story: tax law.

And for that we head to TaxProf blog, where the mighty oak, Paul Caron, addresses the tax implications of the RNC’s clothing expenditure for Palin by linking to a Bloomberg article in which he’s quoted. Palin earned $166,080 last year, according to her tax returns, Bloomberg reports. Under some circumstances, the IRS may consider the clothing income taxable to her, tax experts said.

“This is clearly income,” Caron tells Bloomberg. “The charitable deduction will not eliminate all, or most, of the income,” he said, referring to the credit she could receive by giving the clothes to charity.

In his post, Caron adds: “If there’s no tax consequence when the boss buys you the clothes that make the man that is the man that the boss wants to hire and the man wears the clothes anytime when not in his own home sanctuary, what’s to stop all the company executives and law firm partners from having their firms buy their clothes and letting them wear them on loan, taxfree? Surely that would be one boondoggle for the wealthy too many for American taxpayers to stomach.”

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on October 23, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0129 secs (new cache)