ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

New York Law Journal Featured Columnists October 27, 2008

By David Badertscher, PLL

ADVERTISEMENTS
<font size="1"> <p><font size="2">If you are already an online subscriber to the New York Law Journal you should be able to click on any of the links provided below, sign in, and access the full text of articles listed.</font></p> <p><a href="http://www.nylj.com" target="_blank"><font size="2">http://www.nylj.com</font></a><font size="2"> </font></p> <p><font size="2">Subscription required for online access unless otherwise noted:</font></p> <p><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQSRUSAQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVSR" target="_blank"><font size="2">Estate Planning and Philanthropy</font></a><br/><font size="2">Monday, October 27, 2008<br/>By Conrad Teitell<br/><br/>" Conrad Teitell, a partner at Cummings & Lockwood, writes that a handful of tax incentives for charitable gifts expired at the end of 2007. Those beneficial provisions were part of an omnibus extenders bill that was added to the $700 billion bailout legislation. The rest, as they say, is history. He offers am analysis of the IRA/charitable rollover - the granddaddy and grandma of them all." </font></p><!--commentsListSize 0--><!-- October 27, 2008 --> <p><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQSRUSAQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVSS" target="_blank"><font size="2">Immigration Law</font></a><br/><font size="2">Monday, October 27, 2008<br/>By Angelo A. Paparelli and Ted J. Chiappari<br/><br/>"Angelo A. Paparelli, managing partner of Paparelli & Partners, and Ted J. Chiappari, a partner at Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke, write that immigration policy challenges are apparently more radioactive than nuclear waste. Come January, however, the next administration and the new Congress will have no ready fallout shelter to shield themselves from the career-destroying gamma rays discharged by the public outcry over America's dysfunctional immigration policies."</font></p> <p><font size="2">OUTSIDE COUNSEL:</font></p> <p><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQSRUSAQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVSB" target="_blank"><font size="2">'Kozlowski': Using Internal Probes Against Employees?</font></a><br/><font size="2">Monday, October 27, 2008<br/>By Benjamin E. Rosenberg<br/><br/>" Benjamin E. Rosenberg, a partner at Dechert, writes that in the wake of the Filip Memorandum, <em>Stein </em>and <em>Kozlowski,</em> corporate internal investigations will continue to play a central role in white-collar prosecutions. Corporations may still, notwithstanding the DOJ's new guidelines and the Second Circuit's delineation of employees' Sixth Amendment rights to counsel, choose to cooperate closely with prosecutors. <em>Kozlowski </em>shows how potent such cooperation may be."</font></p> <p><font size="2">SPECIAL REPORTS:</font></p> <h1><font><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQSRUSAQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVSW" target="_blank"><font size="2">E-Discovery</font></a><font size="2"> </font></font></h1><!--change headline--><!--change date--> <p class="date"><font size="2">October 27, 2008</font></p> <p><!--change image--><font size="2">" <!--change image--><!--change body-->In this Special Section from the <em>New York Law Journal</em>: 'When the Custodians Could Be Culprits,' 'Does Your Search Pass Judicial Scrutiny?' and 'Streamlining the Process' " </font><br/><br/><font size="2">Also, in the highlighted article from this section,<br/><br/></font><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQSRUSAQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVSY" target="_blank"><font size="2"><font color="#ff0000">Free:</font> Coming to Terms With Metadata</font></a><br/><font size="2">"Norman C. Simon, a partner with Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, writes that bar associations are very much divided on the question of whether, outside of the discovery context, a receiving attorney may review metadata that is not stripped from an adversary's documents. This split is illustrated by two recent opinions - from the New York County Lawyers' Association and the Colorado State Bar Association - that provide conflicting answers."</font></p></font>

Full post as published by New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library on October 27, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0137 secs (new cache)