ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

New York Law Journal Featured Columnists October 29, 2008

By David Badertscher, PLL

ADVERTISEMENTS
<font size="1"> <p><font size="2">If you are already an online subscriber to the New York Law Journal you should be able to click on any of the links provided below, sign in, and access the full text of articles listed.</font></p> <p><a href="http://www.nylj.com" target="_blank"><font size="2">http://www.nylj.com</font></a><font size="2"> </font></p> <p><font size="2">Subscription required for online access unless otherwise noted:</font></p> <p><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQSRUACQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVD" target="_blank"><font size="2">Civil Rights and Civil Liberties</font></a><br/><font size="2">Wednesday, October 29, 2008<br/>By Christopher Dunn<br/><br/>" Christopher Dunn, associate legal director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, writes that though law-enforcement officials have used Tasers for over two decades, neither the Supreme Court nor the Second Circuit has ever addressed constitutional restrictions on the use of these weapons. A few other federal appeals courts, however, have considered this issue, and the recent tragic events involving the NYPD warrant an examination of their views of Tasers and the Constitution. "</font></p><!--commentsListSize 0--><!-- October 29, 2008 --> <p><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQSRUACQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVSR" target="_blank"><font size="2">Tax Appeals Tribunal</font></a><br/><font size="2">Wednesday, October 29, 2008<br/>By Joseph Lipari and Debra Silverman Herman<br/><br/>"Joseph Lipari, a partner at Roberts & Holland, and Debra Silverman Herman, of counsel at the firm, review a proposal, recently signed by the commissioner of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, to eliminate the 'Temporary Stay' exception beginning in tax year 2009. Those in New York for a limited time, such as students and employees temporarily assigned to their employer's New York office, should take note.</font></p> <p><font size="2">OUTSIDE COUNSEL:</font></p> <p><font size="2"> <a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQSRUACQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVSA" target="_blank">Family Feud on Foley Square</a><br/>Wednesday, October 29, 2008<br/>By Alvin D. Lurie<br/><br/>" Alvin D. Lurie, a tax attorney, writes that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently had to step in and settle a family squabble among eight of its district court judges who, in nine decisions (one judge wrote two) had split 5-to-4 over the arcane, but critical, issue whether the so-called cash balance pension design was inherently flawed by reason of impermissibly discriminating against older participants." </font></p> <p><font size="2">REAL ESTATE TRENDS: </font></p> <p><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQSRUACQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVTT" target="_blank"><font size="2"><font color="red">Free With Registration:</font> Lender Default</font></a><br/><font size="2">Wednesday, October 29, 2008<br/>By Meredith J. Kane and Harris B. Freidus<br/><br/>"Meredith J. Kane and Harris B. Freidus, partners at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, write that the risk to a borrower of lender failure is multiplied where a large construction loan is syndicated among many lenders, each of which is liable to fund only its proportionate share of the loan."</font></p> <p><font size="2">TECHNOLOGY TODAY:</font></p> <p><a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQSRUACQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVTW" target="_blank"><font size="2">A Reasonable Route to ESI Confidentiality</font></a><br/><font size="2">Tuesday, October 28, 2008<br/>By H. Christopher Boehning and Daniel J. Toal<br/><br/>"H. Christopher Boehning and Daniel J. Toal, partners at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, review a recent federal District Court decision holding that counsel may designate an entire document as "confidential" during discovery when only portions of that document contain confidential material, which offers some important guidance - and reassurance - for litigators. "</font> </p></font>

Full post as published by New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library on October 29, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0125 secs (new cache)