Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Race to the BottomThe Tellabs Excuse (A Recap)(Part 3)
By J. Robert Brown
We noted that one of the discipling effects of Tellabs was to require courts to consider all inferences raised by plaintiffs in determining whether they had produced a "strong inference" of scienter. The analysis has already caused some courts to reconsider their approach to allegations that defendants, by virtue of their position, were aware of the company's core operations.
The approach has also clarified to some degree the necessary approach with respect to confidential sources. The Seventh Circuit in Higginbotham suggested that, under Tellabs, confidential sources ought to be ignored or at least deeply discounted. The Seventh Circuit subsequently backed off this approach. See Makor v. Tellabs, 513 F.3d 702, 712 (7th Cir. 2008).
Similarly, the position was rejected by the First Circuit in N.J. Carpenters Pension & Annuity Funds v. Biogen IDEC Inc., 537 F.3d 35 (1st Cir. 2008). As the court noted:
- Tellabs requires that all information in plaintiffs' complaint be evaluated. We think that includes confidential source information, subject to the restrictions stated in our case law. We have never said a complaint would survive if it were based only on confidential source allegations. Indeed, we have said there must be a hard look at such allegations to evaluate their worth.
The language in Higginbotham still has the capacity to cause problems. See Ind. Elec. Workers' Pension Trust Fund Ibew v. Shaw Group, Inc., 537 F.3d 527 (5th Cir. 2008)("That these allegations derive from confidential sources further detracts from their weight in the scienter analysis. Following Tellabs, courts must discount allegations from confidential sources. Higginbotham v. Baxter Int'l Inc., 495 F.3d 753, 756-57 (7th Cir. 2007). Such sources afford no basis for drawing the plausible competing inferences required by Tellabs.").
Nonetheless, the command from Tellabs seems clear enough. Anonymous sources can be a factor in creating an inference of scienter although the strength of the inference will in part depend upon the credibility of the sources, something that will often depend upon the level of detail that accompanies their statements.
We will finish with one more post on this subject tomorrow.
Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on November 12, 2008 (boomark / email).
Apeks Scuba Diving Regulator
Recalled Due To Missing Part
Ellsworth School District
4.4% increase in salaries as part of contract settlement.
Tyson Foods
Donates Chickens as Part of Class Action Settlement
Asbestos Cleanup
Penn. Electric Co. pays part of $77,498 settlement in environmental lawsuit.
Energy Price Gouging
Inergy Propane announces refunds to customers as part of lawsuit settlement.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.

Miller on Tellabs v. Makor Issues & Rights
Seventh Circuit Adheres to Prior Decision in Tellabs
7th Cir. Revisits Tellabs A Milberg Weiss Win
Opinion Recap: Cuellar v. U.S.









