Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Legal Research

: New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

New York Law Journal Featured Columnists November 13, 2008

By David Badertscher, PLL

ADVERTISEMENTS

If you are already an online subscriber to the New York Law Journal you should be able to click on any of the links provided below, sign in, and access the full text of articles listed. <a href="http://www.nylj.com" target="_blank">http://www.nylj.com</a> Subscriprtion required for online access unless otherwise noted: <a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQSRARDQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVSR" target="_blank">Law and Children</a> Thursday, November 13, 2008 By Andrew Schepard " Andrew Schepard, a professor of law and director of the Center for Children, Families and the Law at Hofstra University School of Law, writes that for most of the United States and the rest of the democratic world, the message no fault divorce conveys is that divorce is a tragic but inevitable consequence of the evolution of some adult relationships. In contrast, New York's idiosyncratic and divisive fault divorce grounds send the message that the purpose of divorce is to place blame on someone for the failure of the marriage. Children don't need the legal system to identify a winner and a loser. They need parents to function reasonably effectively and a truce between them, both of which fault divorce discourages."  <a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQSRARDQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVSS" target="_blank">Arbitration</a> Thursday, November 13, 2008 By Samuel Estreicher and Steven C. Bennett "Samuel Estreicher, Dwight D. Opperman Professor at New York University School of Law and counsel to Jones Day, and Steven C. Bennett, a partner at the firm, review the Second Circuit's recent decision in Ross v. American Express, which provides further clarity and guidance as to the application of the doctrine of equitable estoppel to compel arbitration between a signatory to an arbitration agreement and a nonsignatory." OUTSIDE COUNSEL: <a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQSRARDQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVSB" target="_blank">How Ironclad Is That Indemnity Provision?</a> Thursday, November 13, 2008 By Julian D. Ehrlich " Julian D. Ehrlich, senior vice president at Allied North America Insurance Brokerage of New York, writes that frequently, indemnity language that may have seemed clear when written results in unanticipated outcomes when the time comes to apply the provision. Too often, terms thought to be ironclad when agreed upon are later found to be subject to various interpretations or run afoul of statutes or case law rendering the provisions unenforceable as intended." CORPORATE UPDATE: <a href="http://alm.rsys1.net/servlet/cc6?HtuYQSRARDQSVKIHKLjlkxJhmjlkQklHlLQgPQmkVaVTS" target="_blank">Free With Registration: Employment Law Issues</a> Thursday, November 13, 2008 By Philip M. Berkowitz " Philip M. Berkowitz, a partner at Nixon Peabody, writes: What is the expectation of employers in advance of a union- and employee-friendly Obama Administration? Surely, it lies somewhere short of the Armageddon predicted recently by one spokesman for the United States Chamber of Commerce. With the economy in turmoil, the unemployment rate rising precipitously, and corporate layoffs unfortunately becoming more and more prevalent, Mr. Obama's victory comes at a challenging time both for companies and employees. Nevertheless, despite these problems, the atmosphere between employers and employees is relatively positive. "

Full post as published by New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library on November 13, 2008 (boomark / email).