Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Althouse
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: AlthouseThe Supreme Court has taken 2 cases challenging the constraints of election law.
... Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, No. 08-205, arises from ?Hillary: The Movie,? a film by a conservative advocacy group released early this year, when Mrs. Clinton was a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination. The question for the court is whether the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law of 2002 applies to the broadcast of a feature-length film and to television advertisements for it.Before you leap to a conclusion about what the answer ought to be, watch this trailer for the movie:In January, a three-judge panel of the Federal District Court here said the film was an ?electioneering communication? with only one point: ?to inform the electorate that Senator Clinton is unfit for office, that the United States would be a dangerous place in a President Hillary Clinton world and that viewers should vote against her.?
The panel added that advertisements for the film must include spoken and written disclosures, among them that ?Citizens United is responsible for the content of this advertising.?
Citizens United said those requirements were unconstitutionally burdensome. The spoken disclosure, the group told the Supreme Court, ?takes about four seconds to narrate, making 10-second ads virtually impossible and 30-second ads difficult to do.?
The McCain-Feingold law prohibits the use of corporate treasury money, including that of nonprofit issue advocacy groups, to pay for much electioneering communication in a window of 60 days before a general election or 30 days before a primary election. James Bopp Jr., a lawyer for Citizens United, said in a statement issued Friday that ?the notion that a feature-length movie can be banned is a return to the days of government censorship and book-burnings.?
Doesn't that work as an anti-Hillary ad more than as an ad for the movie? A movie could be made just as a device to immunize ads from the usual requirements.
Full post as published by Althouse on November 15, 2008 (boomark / email).
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Ballot Device
Election Systems and Software agrees to pays city of San Francisco $3.5 million settlement after problems with AutoMARK lead to prolonged hand counting of votes.
Salmonella Found in Tomotoes
57 Reported Cases in New Mexico and Texas
ConAgra Peanut Butter
Hundreds of Salmonella Cases Settled
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

Alabama: supreme court dismisses suit challenging election of 4 Democratic senators
Nevada Supreme Court to hold case management hearing for election cases
More breaking news (off-topic): Supreme Court issues order to show cause in Prop. 8 cases
ME- Court to shape sex offender registry debate
Rasmussen Reports: Supreme Court Ratings - January 23-24, 2009
Breaking News: Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Two Election Law Cases This Term
The Supreme Court and the Presidential Election
Voter ID Case Argued Before the Supreme Court
Arkansas Supreme Court Hears Arguments In Buddhist Temple Election Dispute








