ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Craigslist ?Rant? Lands Colorado Man in Criminal Trouble

By Ashby Jones

ADVERTISEMENTS

One of the more, um, amusing corners of the Craigslist world is the site’s Rants and Raves link, a place where anyone (and everyone, it seems) can just spout off on whatever he or she would like. Perhaps not surprisingly, the postings are not always the stuff of Hallmark Cards. (If you click over there, you do so with our fair warning.)

craigslistBut could the mere posting of a “rant” on the site constitute criminal behavior? In Colorado at least, the answer seems “yes.”

A Thursday LA Times article chronicles the saga of one J.P. Weichel, who used the “Rants and Raves” vehicle to “vent” about his former girlfriend, with whom he was locked in a visitation dispute concerning their young daughter. On the site, Weichel allegedly accused the woman child abuse and welfare fraud and making crude comments about her sex life.

The woman said the postings were defamatory. But local authorities took it further and charged Weichel with a crime. According to the story, Colorado is one of a dwindling number of states with a criminal law against libel. While the statute is rarely invoked, Larimer County Dist. Atty. Larry Abrahamson said Colorado’s statute applied precisely to what Weichel was accused of doing. The statute carries a maximum penalty of 18 months in jail.

Not everyone’s happy about it. “Being a jerk isn’t necessarily grounds for felony prosecution,” said Mark Silverstein, legal director at the ACLU of Colorado. Weichel could not be reached for comment.

Colorado’s criminal statute holds that it is illegal to “blacken the memory of one who is dead.” Truth is not a defense in such cases, or in ones that “expose the natural defects of one who is alive.”

“It’s shocking the statute exists,” said David Lane, a First-Amendment lawyer in Denver, “and that someone’s even using it is more shocking.”

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on December 05, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0161 secs (new cache)