ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> MediaShift Idea Lab

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Constitutional Law

: MediaShift Idea Lab

Hiring for Change: How to Staff a New Media Project

By Lisa Williams

ADVERTISEMENTS

Now, I had something all ready to post, but I loved Chris O'Brien's post on Mistakes I Made With The Next Newsroom Project that I'm going to do one of my own.

I've been working on Placeblogger, a 2007 News Challenge Winner, with Tish Grier, over the past year and a half. Like a lot of technical projects, Placeblogger had a ski-jump-like curve of complexity and features; when you're making something new online, you often do a ton of work in the background before anyone sees anything at all.

That's one of the things that makes our most recent release so satisfying; it's a great moment when you, and users, can see and feel the changes you've been working so hard on.

Like Chris, I had assumptions at the beginning of our work that proved incorrect, the biggest of which had to do with hiring for the technical aspects of our work. If you're building out a new service, website, or piece of software, you have a number of options:

  1. DIY. This costs the least money, but depending on your level of sophistication, is the least predictable. It's not always possible to predict how long it will take you to learn what you need to know to get the job done.
  2. Small-bore outsourcing. Break your job into pieces, and use your personal network or even sites like eLance or Rentacoder to get the work done. This is fast and can be effective -- but only if you're really clear about how the pieces fit together.
  3. Large-bore outsourcing. Look for a complete team that has experience working together and includes the skills that you need, from technical architecture, to database administration, to design and UI work. This is reliable, but not always fast, and you pay a premium for the integrated service. If you choose wisely, you'll get excellent quality work, because effective teams are often effective because they have very high quality individual players.

We ultimately chose option #3. While I still think this was the best option for us, I now realize that we neglected the option of bringing on what I like to think of as a "technical cofounder." I can say quite honestly that I did not think that we could or would find a technical lead for our project who would be as passionately committed to it as we were (how many people are there who are really passionate about local blogs? Now, how many of them are excellent PHP coders and UI designers)?

Tish Grier, who is Chief Community Officer for Placeblogger joined with me in doing some mentoring for people who applied to the 2009 News Challenge, and one of the things I counselled them to do was to start the teambuilding now, and don't count out the possibility of a civic-minded programmer joining your team.

Full post as published by MediaShift Idea Lab on December 11, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0119 secs (new cache)