ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

DNA Labratory Tug-of-War in Orange County California Exemplifies Debate Over Forensics

By David Badertscher, PLL

ADVERTISEMENTS
pfont size=2strongSource: /strongemCrime and Justice News, /emDecember 18, 2008./font/p#13; pfont size=2In June, Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas made a bold grab for a crown jewel of local law enforcement: the DNA unit of the sheriff's crime lab, reports the Los Angeles Times. With the lab's director out of town and the sheriff recently deposed by corruption charges, Rackauckas submitted a brief agenda item to county supervisors two business days before their regular meeting. 'Our aim is to make significant changes in the way forensic DNA analysis is conducted,' Rackauckas wrote. The D.A.'s office is 'the only organization capable of harnessing the vast potential of forensic DNA technology.'  /font/p#13; pfont size=2The move capped a three-year tug of war for control of DNA analysis in a historically conservative county where putting criminals behind bars can bring substantial political rewards. 'I have never experienced anything like it in more than 30 years of law enforcement,' recalled Sheriff Sandra Hutchens, who took over the department in the midst of the battle. To end the bickering, one member of the Board of Supervisors proposed putting the county's entire crime lab in the hands of an independent agency headed by a scientist. But, in the end, the board split control among the political players: the D.A., the sheriff and the county chief executive. The power struggle in Orange County is a sign of an intensifying national debate over who should control forensic science -- a question that has taken on new importance with the explosion of genetic evidence. /font/p#13; pa href=http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001GcQZbjnagmUgJUQ0JIipxZHlkWbWebZK0dvrqzYP8pKcW0YPrXAXyI7fWcIQJZ5xsYVOHtYBy5GAmByY0ClCUapUnR7IvTOGR_vG13d4cLXm2nrnwZVusFuFiSV2Ihmtpgxbh7EO1cuiaMFWRhPU-iAmWLJY03UvDhqyenXYeAXrR835iDhTQKyvj7IQK_MMAIs0BsYvR1Mq3_1bu0opb1q3bc6tg6ue shape=rect color=#0000FF target=_blankfont size=2Los Angeles Times/font/a/p

Full post as published by New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library on December 18, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0144 secs (new cache)