Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectTextualism and Jurisdiction
By Alliance Alert
ADVERTISEMENTS
This Article seeks to test textualists' central claims--that their approach is most consistent with the faithful agent conception of the judicial role in statutory interpretation and more likely to constrain judges' capacity to do mischief under the guise of statutory interpretation--by critically examining the manner in which textualists have interpreted jurisdictional statutes.Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on December 30, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Shores: Textualism and Intentionalism in Tax Litigation
Ramsey on Missouri v. Holland and Historical Textualism
The latest on Internet-based jurisdiction
Paulsen: Written Textualism is the Sole Approach for Interpretation








