Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How Appealing"Supreme Court limits 'exclusionary rule'; The 5-4 decision allows police to use evidence seized under a search warrant that is later found to be faulty because of a computer or bookkeeping error"
Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that "Illegally Seized Evidence Can Be Used, Top Court Says."
At "SCOTUSblog," Tom Goldstein has a post titled "The Surpassing Significance of Herring."
And at "The Volokh Conspiracy," Orin Kerr has this post about the ruling.
Full post as published by How Appealing on January 14, 2009 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
PETCO
Animal Food Distribution Unsanitary, Food Seized
Security One
accused of selling faulty alarms
GM
Faulty Storage Latch Causes Recall of Nearly 300,000 Chevrolet HHR Wagons
Zurn Pex Inc.
alleging faulty and defective plumbing led to property damage.
Faulty Homes
Fleetwood Enterprises Inc. pays HUD $75,000 civil penalty for defective construction.
Strip Search Class Action Settled for $900,000
Strip Search Class Action Settled for $900,000

Supreme Court Limits the Exclusionary Rule
U.S. Supreme Court Takes Up Another Exclusionary Rule Case
High Court Upholds Conviction Despite Faulty Warrant
High Court Mulls Reach of Fourth Amendment's 'Exclusionary Rule'








