ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Second Circuit Sentencing Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Federal Judiciary

: Second Circuit Sentencing Blog

Conditions Pre-Trial Detention As A Basis For A Non-Guidelines Sentence

ADVERTISEMENTS

United States v. Guglielmo, No. 07-2368-cr (2d Cir. Jan. 26, 2009) (found here)

Guglielmo argued that the district court erred in not considering the conditions of his pre-trial detention in sentencing him.  The Second Circuit rejected the appeal, noting that "nothing in our case law requires a district court to grant such a departure."

True enough.  But there is a significant body of caselaw in which courts have, in fact, departed or imposed non-Guidelines sentences based on the conditions of pre-trial detention.  And they're worth mentioning here.  If you have such a situation, you might want to check out the following cases:

United States v. Brooks, No. 07-CR-00187 (CPS), 2008 WL 4693335, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2008) (reducing defendant's sentence by six months because of an extended SHU confinement wherein defendant "was confined to his cell for 23 hours a day, only permitted on hour per day of outdoor exercise in a cage, had no contact with other inmates, and had restricted commisary, family and religious visiting, and telephone privileges even though he had not committed a disciplinary infraction")



United States v. Speed Joyeros, S.A., 204 F. Supp. 2d 412, 441 (E.D.N.Y. 2002) ("A court may depart if the defendant has suffered from unusual stress due to a lengthy or particularly stressful [pre-trial] detention")



United States v. Francis, 129 F. Supp. 2d 612 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (Conditions of presentence confinement in state facility, below those in federal institutions, provide grounds for a departure from Sentencing Guidelines, as mitigating circumstance not taken into consideration in preparing Guidelines) (See also cases cited therein)



United States v. Ekwunoh, 888 F. Supp. 369, 373-74 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) (finding that the negative effects of pre-trial incarceration warrant a downward departure)

Full post as published by Second Circuit Sentencing Blog on January 26, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0121 secs (new cache)