ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer

Report Suggests FDA Should Improve Oversight of Doctor Conflicts

By Greg Webb

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Food and Drug Administration needs to improve its oversight of the financial conflicts of doctors who participate in clinical testing before a drug is approved for sale, according to a government watchdog report.

The FDA lacks a complete list of doctors conducting research on new medicines, and it cannot determine which companies have submitted financial information for doctors working on studies, according to a report by the Department of Health and Human Services inspector general.

Of the 118 marketing applications of medicines or medical devices approved in 2007 which were examined by investigators, 42 percent of the applications lacked financial information, and 31 percent of the applications had no documented review of any financial data.

The report urged the FDA to take steps to ensure companies submit complete financial information, and that the submissions are reviewed by the agency. It also said that the FDA should require companies to submit doctors’ financial information before clinical trials on humans begin.

While the FDA agreed with most of the report’s ideas, it rejected the last, saying it “could have the unintended effect of adding to the complexity and cost of the clinical trial enterprise with no commensurate gain in the protection of human subjects or the quality of data.”

Once more, it sounds as if the medical device manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies are, through big money, controlling or deeply influencing governmental decisions and oversight. This has also occurred with the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and the auto industry, as one example. When the fox watches over the henhouse, something is wrong. I cannot imagine how the costs of such oversight would so dramatically impact the “complexity and cost of the clinical trial enterprise” so as to outweigh associated benefits of helping to prevent defective medications or medical devices from being too readily and quickly approved for public consumption. Perhaps I am too cynical.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Greg Webb

Full post as published by Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer on January 27, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/03/26 11:08:28)