Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Mirror of Justice
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Mirror of JusticeGenerational Splits, A Reader Responds
ADVERTISEMENTS
John Wittig, a recent graduate of St. Thomas Law School, writes in:
While I usually attend Mass every week, I am one of those young (just
turned 30) Catholics who feels a "level of disagreement with, dismay
towards, or merely disregard for the Church's teachings on issues like
contraception and homosexuality." You noted that many Catholics born
after Vatican II simply don't attend Mass, and I think that is because
the Church tends to foster an environment where one is either all in
or all out. I've tried to straddle the middle by being invested in my
parish community while largely ignoring the wider Church. I don't want
it to be this way, but it feels like the only things I can do outside
my parish as a layperson is to stop giving money, to stop showing up,
or to wait for the Pope to die and see if things magically change.
None of these are attractive options, nor do they seem fruitful.
Just as I do not desire the current state of affairs, I don't think it
has to be this way either. I think the Church could take a lesson from
the Obama campaign. One of the ways the Obama campaign got people to
be so involved and invested was to make them stakeholders. The
campaign did an excellend job of helping people feel like (then)
Senator Obama and his staff listened to and cared about what they had
to say. This doesn't mean he acted on their ideas, and he sometimes
even went against them, as he did when he voted for telecom-immunity
in the FISA bill. But it did mean there was a genuine dialog going on.
I am not asking the Church to change it's positions on these, and
other, issues. Rather, I am just asking for the Church to provide some
mechanism for there to be dialogue, to give all of us an opportunity
to be agents of Grace, to let us be a part of helping the Church move
closer to Truth.
I do my best to live the Gospels. I want to make the world a better
place, and that includes the Church. But if the Church is going to
insist on only giving me those three options I mentioned earlier, I am
going to continue to ignore it. If I've learned nothing else in my
short time on Earth, it's that if we can't talk, we can't do anything
together.
turned 30) Catholics who feels a "level of disagreement with, dismay
towards, or merely disregard for the Church's teachings on issues like
contraception and homosexuality." You noted that many Catholics born
after Vatican II simply don't attend Mass, and I think that is because
the Church tends to foster an environment where one is either all in
or all out. I've tried to straddle the middle by being invested in my
parish community while largely ignoring the wider Church. I don't want
it to be this way, but it feels like the only things I can do outside
my parish as a layperson is to stop giving money, to stop showing up,
or to wait for the Pope to die and see if things magically change.
None of these are attractive options, nor do they seem fruitful.
Just as I do not desire the current state of affairs, I don't think it
has to be this way either. I think the Church could take a lesson from
the Obama campaign. One of the ways the Obama campaign got people to
be so involved and invested was to make them stakeholders. The
campaign did an excellend job of helping people feel like (then)
Senator Obama and his staff listened to and cared about what they had
to say. This doesn't mean he acted on their ideas, and he sometimes
even went against them, as he did when he voted for telecom-immunity
in the FISA bill. But it did mean there was a genuine dialog going on.
I am not asking the Church to change it's positions on these, and
other, issues. Rather, I am just asking for the Church to provide some
mechanism for there to be dialogue, to give all of us an opportunity
to be agents of Grace, to let us be a part of helping the Church move
closer to Truth.
I do my best to live the Gospels. I want to make the world a better
place, and that includes the Church. But if the Church is going to
insist on only giving me those three options I mentioned earlier, I am
going to continue to ignore it. If I've learned nothing else in my
short time on Earth, it's that if we can't talk, we can't do anything
together.
Full post as published by Mirror of Justice on January 27, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Stock Splits and Reverse Stock Splits
How splits can affect stock value
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

A Generational Change in Academia
Teleseminar - How To Be Your Own Generational Coach
Cross-Generational Influences in Legal Writing
Shaviro: The Long-Term Fiscal Gap & Generational Inequity
Nations Torn over eBay Liability in Fake-Goods Cases








