ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Structured Settlements 4Real

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: Structured Settlements 4Real

New York Structured Settlement Vig Takers May Not Be Able to Hide From Dinallo

By John Darer

ADVERTISEMENTS

The draft regulations issued earlier this week by the New York Insurance Department include rules that establish "minimum disclosure requirements." Those requirements include the nature and amount of compensation, as well as language that tells consumers an agent "may have incentives" to recommend a particular policy "based on the amount of compensation paid." It also includes a mechanism for clients to request information about producers' compensation which was not known at the time of sale - in other words, contingent commissions.

It will be interesting to see how the National Structured Settlement Trade Association reacts to the proposed rules given its very public rejection of the structured settlement transparency initiative, a voluntary effort to provide transparency to tort victims, judges and plaintiff attorneys who work with structured settlement professionals.

The subject of disclosure of factoring kick backs and broker/planner business practices has surprisingly been an extremely volatile topic of discussion in the structured settlement industry. Despite the shocking disclosure that the overwhelming majority of structured settlement broker/settlement planner clientele of Bentzen Funding Solutions are on the take, the overwhelming majority of the industry operates in the shadows and alleyways on the topic. We know people are doing it, but few seem willing to own up to it. This author's Brandeisian effort of "shining light as disinfectant" was even inarticulately labeled McCartheyesque. Any such transparency intiative by the New York Insurance Department should involve mandatory disclosures of ALL PARTIES to whom compensation is made so that CONSUMERS can have a proper understanding  about how such compensation affects the pricing and so they have the ability to negotiate.

This author supports an amendment to New York's Structured Settlement Protection Act which would require mandatory disclosure of all parties to whom compensation is made in structured settlement factoring transactions.

Full post as published by Structured Settlements 4Real on February 09, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0032 secs (from cache 11/05/26 21:00:48)