Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IPKat

Intellectual Property Law

: IPKat

What is the value of the NetBook trade mark?

By Johanna Gibson, David Pearce, Jeremy Phillips and Ilanah Simon.

The IPKat's friend and IP Finance weblog colleague Rob Harrison has penned the following piece which seems so interesting that the IPKat asked if he could give it a wider audience. Writes Rob:

"Some of you may have been following UK/Canadian company Psion Teklogix?s attempts to enforce its rights to the trade mark Netbook against a number of vendors. Psion filed the mark in the EU 1996 and it was registered in 1998 (Number 000428250). The trade mark was being used in May 2000 (as this article in German demonstrates) and at least until 2004 in the US, if this entry is to be believed.

In the meantime, the term ?netbook? has been widely used to describe small laptops that are designed for wireless communication and access to the internet (see link here).

Psion (now called Psion Teklogix) started sending a number of bloggers and vendors cease and desist letters to stop the trade mark being used. While some larger retailers seem to have complied (Germany?s MediaMarkt, for instance, now just calls them notebooks), a whole community has grown up to oppose Psion?s attempt to monopolise the mark. Their discussion can be found here.

Dell it seems have now filed for revocation of the mark in the EU and in the United States on the grounds that the trade mark has not been used. Dell ? which last year attempted to monopolise another common industry term by filing a trade mark application for ?Cloud Computing? in the US -- have been hailed as ?saviours? in the community. Nothing has, of course, yet been decided. Dell?s representatives have stated that the mark has not been used in the European Union for five years ? but at this stage no detailed explanation has been given.

The case is fascinating. We see a company like Psion filing a trade mark for a sign way before the word had entered the English (and many other languages) as a designation for a whole new category of goods. The sign then becomes the common designation for the category of goods ? and Psion attempt to enforce their trade mark rights. It?s not a clear cut case like Kleenex tissues (for US and UK consumers) or Tempo tissues (for German and Austrian consumers). The mark appears not to have been continually used and Psion certainly discontinued at least one product using this brand (as noted on their discontinued products page).

The brand could be worth millions, given its adoption to designate a category of products. Or it could be worth nothing since Psion ceased using it and failed to maintain the brand".

Ever interested in his readers' comments, the IPKat throws Rob's piece open for debate.

Net book here
Net book agreement here
Newt book here

Full post as published by IPKat on February 23, 2009 (boomark / email).