ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Failure to appeal an administrative law judges ruling precludes the reopening of the issue in a subsequent proceeding

ADVERTISEMENTS
Failure to appeal an administrative law judges ruling precludes the reopening of the issue in a subsequent proceeding
Matter of Cipriano v Onondaga County Corrections, 2009 NY Slip Op 01559, decided on March 5, 2009, Appellate Division, Third Department

Onondaga County Assistant Corrections Commissioner Peter A. Cipriano suffered a heart attack and underwent coronary bypass surgery. Two years later he was awarded workers' compensation benefits.

A year later Cipriano cease working due to stress-related angina episodes and was awarded compensation benefits for that condition as well.

When Cipriano subsequently underwent treatment for coronary artery disease, Onondaga County objected to paying for the treatment contending that it was not causally related to his employment. A Workers' Compensation Law Judge, rejecting Onondaga?s theory and determined that Cipriano sustained a permanent total disability, which decision was affirmed by the Workers' Compensation Board.

Onondaga County and its workers' compensation carrier appealed the Board?s decision. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board?s ruling.

The court noted that although a Workers' Compensation Law Judge had earlier determined that Cipriano's coronary artery disease was an occupational disease, it ?failed to seek Board review of that decision.? Thus, said the court, its present challenge to causation is not properly before us.

Rejecting Onondaga?s appeal, the Appellate Division said that ?As a final matter, we are satisfied that the Board properly reviewed and weighed the evidence and did not apply an incorrect standard in reaching its decision.?

The full text of the decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2009/2009_01559.htm

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on March 09, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/02/26 15:03:10)