Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> BC Law Intell. Prop. & Tech. Forum
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: BC Law Intell. Prop. & Tech. ForumWyeth v. Levine - Are we in for a world of ubiquitous black box warnings?
By jbroses
ADVERTISEMENTS
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Wyeth v. Levine held that FDA approval of a drug’s labeling does not preempt a state law tort claim for inadequate labeling. So what do you do if you’re counsel to a pharmaceutical company making physician-administered drugs? Put the biggest, scariest black box warning you can on every prescription drug you sell. There’s no downside! Physicians frequently don’t read labeling, relying instead on prior experience with the dru read more
Full post as published by BC Law Intell. Prop. & Tech. Forum on March 24, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Richard Epstein in Forbes on Wyeth v. Levine
Washington Post Editorial on Wyeth v. Levine
Chat with Levine of Wyeth v. Levine
SCOTUSwiki Preview: Wyeth v. Levine
Wyeth Letter to Supreme Court re Pfizer Acquisition
Wyeth's Principal Brief in Levine Filed








