ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

By Jim Hamilton

ADVERTISEMENTS

NASAA Rebuts SIFMA Testimony on Legal Standards of Care

The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), the Consumer Federation of America, and the Investment Adviser Association have called upon Congress to apply a fiduciary duty to all financial professionals who give investment advice regarding securities. Writing in a joint comment letter to Chairman Christopher Dodd and Ranking Member Richard Shelby of the Senate Banking Committee, the organizations sought to rebut recent testimony from the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) concerning the legal standards of care owed to investors by broker-dealers and investment advisers. Although agreeing that investor protection would be strengthened if a consistent legal standard governed the provision of investment advisory services, the organizations strongly disagreed with SIFMA that the standard should be anything less than a fiduciary duty. Accordingly, the organizations urged Congress to extend fiduciary standards to all entities providing investment advice, regardless of their licensing status.

The organizations rejected SIFMA's recommendation of a "universal standard of care" that expresses principles of "fair dealing" in plain English. The organizations acknowledged the superficial appeal of such a standard, one apparently based on the good faith and fair dealing requirements in arm's length transactions between commercial parties under the Uniform Commercial Code. The organizations strongly believe, however, that the application of this commercial standard to the relationship of financial service providers and their clients would greatly diminish investor protection. Rather, the organizations believe that the investor protection benefits of investment adviser fiduciary standards, under which advisers have an affirmative duty to act in the best interests of their clients and to make full and fair disclosure regarding conflicts of interest, should be extended to anyone who offers investment advice, including broker-dealers.

Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on March 25, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.012 secs (new cache)