ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> TortDeform.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Consumer Law

: TortDeform.com

Banks do the darndest things...

By Kia Franklin

ADVERTISEMENTS

Here are just a few civil justice tidbits with a banking twist, for your weekend reading pleasure:

Inherited from the prior administration (surprise, surprise), here's something that's got some preemption, some bailout madness, and some consumer abuse all in one. The DOJ is supporting Bank of America in a case related to BofA taking elderly customers' social security and disability benefits to pay overdraft fees. California law forbids banks from seizing protected funds like social security benefits. From MoJo: "Even if Obama wanted to do right by the low-income and disabled citizens ripped off by the bank, the administration could be risking millions of taxpayer dollars [since we gave the bank bailout money] if it reversed course in the litigation and the verdict were restored."

This is a bit dated now, but Jed Lewison shares a clip of Rep. John Boehner saying that deregulation of the financial markets didn't happen, and thus didn't contribute to the current mess we're in. (He must have forgotten about the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which he supported and the Heritage Foundation praised as "the most significant deregulation of the financial services industry in over half a century.") Oopsies.

Good to see our money is being put to good use. Commonweal's Dave Johnson writes about how TARP recipients are using our money to actively lobby against consumer protections like the Arbitration Fairness Act, the Fairness in Nursing Home Arbitration Act, and the Mortgage Reform and Anit-Predatory Lending Act (among many others), while also lobbying to protect their ability to dish out big bonuses and avoid an increase in bank regulation. He argues that "it is time to open a discussion about whether any corporate funds - whether the company is a recipient of TARP funding or not - should be used to influence our government. We should be telling them what to do, not the other way around." Go Dave!

Full post as published by TortDeform.com on March 27, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0136 secs (new cache)