ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Local Law Blogs Blogs -> New Jersey Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Local Law Blogs

: New Jersey Law Blog

Redeveloper Agreements - Designating the Redeveloper

ADVERTISEMENTS

Under the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law (LRHL), a redevelopment entity is allowed to enter into a contract with a private redeveloper. The redevelopment entity is allowed broad discretion in selecting a private redeveloper and currently no specific statutory guidelines for the designation of a redeveloper exist. However, a redevelopment entity must still act rationally in choosing a redeveloper for a given redevelopment project. For example, a redevelopment entity must be sure that the redeveloper it selects is competent having both the technical expertise and the financial wherewithal to carry out the redevelopment project with which it is being entrusted. The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court made clear in Vineland Const. Co. Inc. v. Township of Pennsauken, 395 N.J. Super. 230, 255 (App. Div 2007) that mere 'political connections' are insufficient to justify the designation of a particular person or company as a redeveloper. The public good is not served by such an appointment. Ibid. at 257-258.

 

A redevelopment entity must also take care not to enter into a redeveloper agreement in anticipation of the project area that is the subject of such agreement being made the subject of a redevelopment plan. On the contrary, in Monroe Properties, LLC, et al. v. The City of Hoboken, et al., an unreported decision decided after the Vineland Const. case, the Appellate Division squarely rejected an attempt on the part of a municipality to select a private redeveloper prior to designating the study area as an area in need of redevelopment. The Court made clear that a municipality or other redevelopment entity has no inherent authority to enter into a memorandum of understanding for redevelopment but, rather, must abide the statutory procedure set forth in the LRHL. Once a municipality has determined that a particular geographic area within its jurisdiction is in need of redevelopment or in need of rehabilitation and has adopted a redevelopment plan for such area, then it or a separate redevelopment entity designated by the municipal governing body may exercise redevelopment functions, which includes, among other things, entering into contracts with redevelopers 'for the planning, replanning, construction, or undertaking of any project or redevelopment work.' N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-8f.

Full post as published by New Jersey Law Blog on March 31, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0247 secs (from cache 11/01/26 00:24:26)