Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Charlottesville Personal Injury LawyerMedtronic Heart Device Linked To a Possible Thirteen Deaths
By Greg Webb
Medtronic admitted that at least thirteen people might have died in correlation with a heart device, known as Sprint Fidelis, that it recalled in 2007 but was still in widespread use. This number includes four patients who died while surgeons were attempting to remove the product and is the first new data to reflect fatalities since the device was first recalled; the other nine deaths may be tied to the device's failure to work properly. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has also said it received about 2,200 reports of serious injuries related to the device. The heart device is a thin electrical cable that connects an implanted defibrillator to the patient's heart. It was recalled due to fractures in the cable that may cause the defibrillator to fire for no reason or fail to deliver a life saving shock to a patient's irregular beating heart. Presently about 150,000 patients still have the Sprint Fidelis leads in their bodies.
A previously disclosed Food and Drug Administration (FDA) report shows Medtronic began receiving reports about the problem in 2004, three years before they declared a recall; they even conducted their own internal investigations. This report is based on a visit by regulators to the Medtronic facility soon after the device was taken off the market, where officials interviewed executives and reviewed records. The company also changed their manufacturing process in the months leading up to taking the device off the market. A top Medtronic official, however, claims this 'acute' change had nothing to do with the recall and even at the time of the recall, internal data did not suggest the device was fracturing at higher rates than other company leads.
By 2006, it is believed Medtronic knew there was a problem. The timeline regarding exactly when Medtronic knew about the problems with Sprint Fidelis could be a significant factor if patient lawsuits begin again. The Supreme Court recently agreed that patients may not sue device manufacturers whose products were approved by the FDA, however, new legislation introduced by Democrats in Congress may nullify this decision.
Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Greg WebbFull post as published by Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer on April 06, 2009 (boomark / email).
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Bextra Product Recall
Find a Bextra Lawyer
Bextra Injury Risks
Bextra Increases Risk of Fatal Heart Attack
Medtronic CD Horizon
allegedly recalled as defective device for being prone to failure, shearing and cable breaks.
Antipsychotic Medications
Linked to Cardiovascular Deaths in the Elderly
Medtronic's Infuse Bone Graft
allegedly linked to life-threatening complications.
Agent Orange,
Heart Disease, and Parkinson's Disease may be Linked
Reports of Child Deaths Prompt Recalls of Two Million Graco Strollers
Two Million Graco Strollers Recalled Four Strangulation Deaths Reported
Entanglement Deaths
Prompt Recall of Window Blinds

Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Deaths 13 Admitted Fatalities from Defective Heart Device
Heart Device Linked to More Than a Dozen Deaths
Judge Dismisses Medtronic Device Lawsuit
Medtronic death rates snag FDAs attention
13 Deaths Tied to Medtronic Heart Device
Medtronic Recalls Selected Heparin-Coated Products








