Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement UpdatesModavox Pleased With New York District Court Markman Hearing Ruling
By Philip Brooks
The following is excerpted from a March 27, 2009 Modavox press release at PR Newswire:
Modavox, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: MDVX), Internet broadcasting pioneer and holder of several patented technologies, today announced that a decision has been reached by Hon. Colleen McMahon in the Southern District Court of New York in its patent infringement lawsuit vs. Tacoda, Inc., filed on August 9, 2007 seeking injunctive relief and unspecified damages.
In patent litigation, Markman hearings are used for claim construction. Typically, the plaintiff and defendant set out a list of claim terms whose definitions are in dispute. To clarify the meaning of these terms (and subsequently the scope and validity of the patents), a judge weighs evidence and definitions as presented by the plaintiff and defendant and makes a ruling in the form of a Markman Order.
The five terms disputed within the claims construction and presented at the Markman Hearing have been ruled upon by the Court. Modavox is pleased with the Judge's analysis believing the results fully support the Company's infringement contentions while reinforcing its patent enforcement strategy. The judge has also provided additional time for the inclusion of expert testimony and introduction of extrinsic evidence regarding the term 'functionality'. Modavox is further pleased with this ruling in addition to the schedule put forth by the court. The Company is actively preparing its response in accordance with the Court's scheduling order and looks forward to having experts work with its counsel, Shaub & Williams LLP, to further support the remaining term definition.
See the full press release here.
Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on April 09, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Dumb New York Laws
Stupid Laws in the Empire State
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
New York Building Codes
Building and constructions laws in New York
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.
Katrina Victims See Justice, Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Katrina Victims See Justice Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
New York Employment Law
alleged violations of New York employment law.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation

Delaware IP and Markman Matters
How Not to Appeal a Markman Ruling
District Court Must Provide Underlying Reasoning For "Exceptional Case" Determination
Limiting the number of claims construed








