Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> 43(B)log
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Consumer Law
: 43(B)logToo much attribution?
By Rebecca Tushnet
ADVERTISEMENTS
This discussion of a Dow Jones site's reuse of other blog content suggests that over-attribution, though accurate, was the source of bloggers' protest: by using pictures and bylines for the bloggers, the site seemed to imply that the bloggers were actually working with the site. Would a Lanham Act claim be barred by Dastar? I think not (though I wouldn't advise bringing the claim or think it ought to be won), but there are cases out there that suggest otherwise.Full post as published by 43(B)log on April 10, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

EFFs Dany OBrien on Copying and Attribution in a Digital Age
DRAFT Creative Commons Statement of Intent for Attribution-ShareAlike Licenses
"Nanotechnology and the Attribution of Responsibility"
NOTICE: Duncan Riley Is the Source of the Following Information








