Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawDuty Of Fair Representation Jurisprudential Reform:
42 U. Michigan J. L. Reform 517 (Spring 2009)
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=493458#ByDownloads
In this Law Review article Professor Rubinstein considers what he describes as ?One of the best kept secrets in American labor law.? The secret: the duty of fair representation jurisprudence simply does not work!
Professor Rubinstein explains:
1. It does not work for plaintiff union members because they must satisfy a close-to-impossible burden of proof and have a short statute of limitations window in which to assert their claim.
2. It does not work for defendant unions because they are often forced to file pointless grievances in order to avoid the cost of litigation.
3. It does not work for defendant employers because they are often brought into these lawsuits because they have the ?deep pockets.?
Professor Rubinstein makes two proposals to reform duty of fair representation jurisprudence.
First, this Article posits that putative plaintiffs should be required to have their claims adjudicated before internal union review tribunals as opposed to courts. This internal tribunal system, if procedurally and substantively fair, would provide unions with a complete defense to duty of fair representation claims. This would move most duty of fair representation disputes from the ex-post stage (after a court dispute has arisen) to the ex-ante stage (before a court dispute has arisen) and reduce unnecessary litigation.
Second, this Article argues that the current system needs to be ?tweaked? to return to the original Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171 (1967), intent of utilizing rearbitration as a remedy, as distinguished from money damages, when a breach of the duty of fair representation is found.
For other Law Review articles by Professor Rubinstein that may be downloaded, go to:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=493458#ByDownloads
*Adjunct Professor of Law, St. John?s Law School and New York Law School. Editor, Adjunct Law Professor Blog, http://www.lawprofessors.typepad.com/adjunctprofs; B.S., Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations; J.D. with distinction, Hofstra University School of Law. Professor Rubinstein practices labor law in New York City, has published several law review articles and welcomes comments. He may be reached at professorrubinstein@gmail.com.
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on April 15, 2009 (boomark / email).
Torts
Introduction to Torts
Fair Housing Act
Prevent discrimination by landlords
Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
Northwestern Mutual
Faces $200 Million Fair Labor Class Action
Disability Access
Developers pay $175,000 settlement for failing to comply with the Fair Housing Act.
Boat Crash
Police officer awarded $100,000 settlement after crashing into bridge piling while on duty.
New York City
$1.5 million settlement after a family of four was killed by an off duty drunken police officer.

Union Member Breach of Contract Claim Against Union Preempted By Duty of Fair Representation
Distinguishing Between Employees Is Not A Breach of The Duty Of Fair Representation
Rare Cause of Action For Breach of Duty Of Fair Representation Stated
Del Mar on Tradition & Discourse in Jurisprudence








