ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Malpractice Blogs -> New York Attorney Malpractice Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Malpractice

: New York Attorney Malpractice Blog

Ahorn Legal Malpractice, and Retainer Agreements

By (Andrew Lavoott Bluestone)

ADVERTISEMENTS

In Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Ahlborn, 547 U.S. 268, 126 S. Ct. 1752,  it was "held that from a $550,000 negotiated settlement in a case arising from a car accident, the Arkansas Medicaid authority could recover only $35,581.47 (about one-sixth) of the $215,645.30 it had paid for treatment of Heidi Ahlborn's injuries, because the $550,000 settlement represented only about one-sixth of the reasonable value of the claim. "
 

Author Howard S. Davis, [disclosure:  HSD was a mentor of NYAMB} writes in today's New York Law Journal on this issue:  how does Ahorn affect plaintiff's settlement proceeds, what must an attorney do after settling or winning a case, and how does a retainer agreement's construction affect the attorney's fees and obligations?

HSD writes: "The Ahlborn decision answered many questions concerning Medicaid liens in personal injury litigation. In the process, by implication, it overturned well-established New York law allowing local Medicaid authorities to collect Medicaid liens in full from settlements in personal injury lawsuits. (See Cricchio v. Pennisi, 90 N.Y.2d 296 [1997]; Gold v. United Health Services, 95 N.Y.2d 683 [2001]; see also Lugo v. Beth Israel Medical Center, 13 Misc. 3d 681, 819 N.Y.S.2d 892 [July 21, 2006]; Harris v. City of New York, 16 Misc. 3d 674, 837 N.Y.S.2d 486 [March 29, 2007]; Chambers v. Jain, 15 Misc. 3d 1120, 839 N.Y.S.2d 432 [April 13, 2007].)2 But Ahlborn did not answer the question whether plaintiffs in tort cases can compel their attorneys, for no additional fee, to negotiate the allocation of the recovery - and even, if necessary, compel them to initiate court proceedings to fix the allocation.

In other words, in New York, after Ahlborn, the question remained whether attorneys, either plaintiffs' personal injury attorneys or outside counsel, were entitled to a fee, in addition to the fee permitted by the Appellate Division rules for prosecuting and settling personal injury cases, for negotiating an Ahlborn allocation or getting a court to set one."
 

Full post as published by New York Attorney Malpractice Blog on April 20, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 11/04/26 12:07:24)