ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate Governance

: The Race to the Bottom

Counseling Boards in the Current Crisis: Rocky Mountain Securities Conference

By Scott James

ADVERTISEMENTS

The highlight of the day for me was the panel on counseling boards of directors, moderated by Cathy Krendl, including James Doty, John Olson, and Josiah Hatch. This panel covered a wealth of topics including fiduciary duties, mergers and acquisitions, deal protection devices, say on pay, disclosure, broker-dealer voting, and access.

Mr. Doty started the discussion with an impressive 13 minute summary of Delaware case law regarding director reliance on experts and fiduciary duties. Among the cases he discussed were Citicorp, Stone v. Ritter, Lyondell v. Ryan, and Gantler v. Stevens.

Next, Mr. Olson addressed the tensions between directors and shareholders, and how government's presence in the board room creates a new dynamic. Olson then paralleled Parratt's and Shapiro's words that shareholder access is coming very soon.

Say on Pay was another hot topic in this panel. Currently, TARP requires say on pay for companies accepting substantial money, but the SEC has yet to create a rule on this topic. Nonetheless, Congress stated that this provision is effective immediately. The panel expressed concerns about compliance with this provision absent an SEC rule providing instruction.

Olson pointed to Intel as an example of a corporation implementing say on pay. The company asked shareholders if they agreed with the compensation committee's policies and procedures for determining compensation. According to the panel, simply asking shareholders how they feel about policies and procedures may not be enough. The company probably must ask if shareholders approve of policies, procedures, base compensation, and incentive compensation.

Ms. Krendl posed an interesting question towards the end of the session, asking if directors who are forced by the government to take a certain action can satisfy their fiduciary duties by claiming 'the government made me do it.' The panel briefly discussed this issue surrounding Bear Stearns and Bank of America.

I was honored to attend the conference and hear from the collection of brilliant securities lawyers that presented. I look forward to next year.

Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on May 13, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0036 secs (from cache 11/05/26 08:05:25)