ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> BarfBlog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: BarfBlog

Sure kids can visit the farm, but should they be hugging the cows?

By Dr. Doug Powell

ADVERTISEMENTS

Yesterday I wrote about a bunch of schoolkids in Carlisle , U.K. that have been stricken with cryptosporidium, apparently related to so called-educational visits to nearby farms.

Teachers and school leaders said there were lots of precautions and lots of handwashing. So Shane Morris sent me a picture from the May 1, 2009 edition of the Cumberland News, (right) which documented the trip that apparently sickened the kids and included this charming picture, right, of cow-kid cuddling. Did she sanitize her cheek? And who knows what else went on.

Scott Weese of the Worms and Germs Blog wrote this morning that a recent study by Pritchard et al in the Veterinary Record reports that in samples collected from various animals on 31 different farms in U.K., verotoxigenic E. coli, like O157, was found on 61% of premises. Presence of young cattle and, surprisingly, adult pigs were identified as risk factors for finding verotoxigenic E. coli at a location. Verotoxigenic E. coli were most commonly identified in cattle (29%). It wasn't surprising that cattle, especially young cattle, were the most common carriers based on what we know about the bacterium, but there were impressively high rates of carriage by other species, including sheep (24%), donkeys (15%), pigs (14%), horses (12%) and goats (10%).

On most farms where verotoxigenic E. coli was found, the same strain was identified in different animal species, indicating that this bacterium can spread widely on such premises. This may be because different animal species in petting zoos are mixed together, as opposed to the situation on conventional farms.

(Weese notes: the premises were evaluated following suspicion that they could have been the source of infection of people, so it's possible that the numbers reported are higher than for the overall population of such farms.)


Weese writes,

'The risk of people acquiring an infection from animals depends more on the degree of contact and the precautions adopted than the prevalence of infection in a particular species.'

Where does cow hugging and possible face-licking rank on the risk scale?

Full post as published by BarfBlog on May 17, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0024 secs (from cache 11/03/26 22:39:18)