Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IPKat
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IPKatAlendronate dosage patent: the Hague District Court rules
By Jeremy
The IPKat has just learned from his Dutch friends Mark van Gardingen and Richard Ebbink (Brinkhof) that the Hague District Court today not only nullified the Dutch segment of Merck's European patent (EP 1 175 904) for a 70 mg once-weekly dosage regimen of alendronate (an osteoporosis medicament) but, for the first time in Europe as far as they are aware, also granted a declaratory judgment that tablets containing 70 mg generic alendronate, intended for once-weekly use to treat osteoporosis, were obvious to the skilled man on the priority date of the '904 patent as well as any pending or future divisional based on the same priority filing.Right: some patients prefer to receive their dosages as infrequently as possible
Today's Dutch decision has employed the rationale used by Mr Justice Kitchin in his 31 July 2007 decision (see IPKat post here) concerning the UK part of the same European patent and divisionals to its ultimate consequence. Indeed, the Dutch decision actually refers to Kitchin J?s decision.
The IPKat, who thanks Mark and Richard for sending him this news item, suspects that further discussion of the deployment of the declaration as a tool in patent litigation may just be around the corner.
One reason why alendronate is big business here
Full post as published by IPKat on February 13, 2008 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million

Comments on the Northern District's Local Patent Rules
9th Circuit Modifies Local Patent Rules
Interesting Conflicts Decision from the Sixth Circuit: COGSA or Hague-Visby
Federal court strikes down new patent rules
Northern District of California Considering Changes to Its Local Patent Rules
Court Issues Permanent Injunction Against USPTO Patent Rule Changes








