ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> University of Louisville Law Faculty

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: University of Louisville Law Faculty

Peter Scott Campbell's blog: Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Muller v. Oregon

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Louis D. Brandeis School of Law at the University of Louisville occasionally awards the Brandeis Medal to people who have made significant contributions to individual liberty and public service. The 2003 recipient was Ruth Bader Ginsburg. At the award ceremony, Bader Ginsburg gave the speech “From Brandeis to Breyer: Is There a Jewish Seat?” Unfortunately, I can’t find a copy of the speech online, but it was printed in the Brandeis at 150 book.

Bader Ginsburg has recently made the news with a couple more Brandeis-related appearances. In December 2008, she presided over a re-argument of Muller v. Oregon, an event organized by the Supreme Court Historical Society to commemorate the 100th anniversary of that landmark case. She also on two occasions (September 12, 2008 at the Willamette University College of Law and on February 13, 2009 at Rutgers-Newark Law School) gave a speech on the history of the case and its impact over the years.

It’s hard to think of anyone more suited to give that speech, since she’s not only a Supreme Court justice, but also someone who life was indirectly affected by the Court’s decision. While celebrated as the case that introduced “The Brandeis Brief” and the use of social science statistics in legal arguments, it has also been heavily criticized over the years as the genesis of a number of paternalistic laws that kept women from applying for a number of jobs. Bader Ginsburg outlines the impact Muller had on 20th century labor rights and legislation for both men and women, a lot of it negative.

So is Bader Ginsburg against the decision reached in Muller? Having been given the chance to reverse the decision in the re-enactment, did she take it? I’ll let you read that for yourself. The Legal Times Blog has an account of the re-argument. It sounds like it was a lot of fun. I would have loved to have been there.

You can read more of  the reasoning behind her decision in her speeches. The Willamette version of the speech has been reprinted in the volume 45, third issue of the Willamette Law Review. The Rutgers version of the speech can be found online here.

Full post as published by University of Louisville Law Faculty on May 31, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0019 secs (from cache 11/03/26 06:30:59)