Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Niches Blogs -> GamePolitics.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Niches
: GamePolitics.comFederal Judge: Madden Monopoly Suit May Proceed Against EA
By gamepolitics
A U.S. District Court Judge in San Francisco has ruled that monopoly claims filed against Electronic Arts by a pair of Madden buyers may continue.
EA had previously requested that Judge Vaughn Walker dismiss claims by Geoffrey Pecover and Jeffrey Lawrence. The two Madden buyers, serving as named plaintiffs in the class-action suit, alleged that by eliminating competition for NFL-licensed games EA had acted in a monopolistic fashion and unjustly enriched itself at the expense of consumers. On Friday Judge Walker issued a ruling denying EA's motion. The Judge did, however, rule that only claims in California and Washington, D.C. would go forward since that is where the two named plaintiffs in the case reside.
Significantly, in turning down EA's request to dismiss, Judge Walker wrote that "interactive video football software" is a recognizable product market for anti-trust purposes:
As the court understands these allegations, interactive football software will not sell if it does not use the names, logos and other markers of teams that actually compete in the NFL; there is, in effect, no market for interactive football software in a virtual or fictitious setting. If true —— as the court must at this point accept —— this adequately alleges that there are no substitutes for interactive football software without the markers of actual teams and players.
The suit, essentially following a line of reasoning laid out here on GamePolitics, describes how EA, faced with competition from Take-Two's excellent NFL 2K5, reduced the price of Madden from $49.99 to $29.99 in order to stay competitive with NFL 2K5, which was aggressively priced at $19.99. However, once the exclusive NFL and NFLPA deals were inked, the unlicensed NFL 2K series was discontinued and EA, facing no competition, jacked the price of Madden back up to $49.99.
DOCUMENT DUMP: Grab a copy of Judge Walker's ruling.
SEE ALSO: Spirited courtroom argument in Pecover vs. EA... Read all GamePolitics coverage of Pecover vs. EA...
Full post as published by GamePolitics.com on June 08, 2009 (boomark / email).
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Environmental Class Action to Proceed Against DuPont
DuPont New Jersey Drinking Water Contamination Class Action to Proceed
Baltimore Strip Search Class Action
Judge Gives Go-ahead
NCAA and Ticketmaster
alleging they have a monopoly on college sports events and charge non-refundable fees to enter a lottery for the rights to purchase tickets to the sporting events.
AOL Privacy Class Action
Can Proceed
Apple Inc.
allegedly maintained an illegal monopoly on the digital music market.
Taylor Bean Faces Federal WARN Class Action
Taylor Bean Federal Employment Class Action Filed

Judge Allows Copyright Infringement Suit To Proceed Against State Employee
Torture Suit Against Rumsfeld Allowed to Proceed
D.C. Circuit Revives Cruise Ship Company's Suit Against Canada
Law of the Game on Joystiq: The Madden Suit
RETIRED NFL PLAYERS V. MADDEN AND ELECTRONIC ARTS
Paparazzi Files Hit and Run Suit
Madden v. Cowen & Co.: SLUSA's "Delaware Carve-Out" Applies to Suit Against M&A Financial Adviser








