Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Niches Blogs -> GamePolitics.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Niches
: GamePolitics.comIs Possessing RapeLay a Federal Crime in the United States?
By gamepolitics
Much has been written about RapeLay since the controversial Hentai game was discovered for sale on Amazon a few months back.
But while the debate thus far has largely centered around whether Japan, where RapeLay and most similar titles originate, should allow games featuring sexual violence to be published, a recent court ruling suggests that U.S. citizens who possess RapeLay and games of its ilk may be guilty of a federal offense.
Wired's Threat Level blog reports that on Monday the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused to consider the appeal of Dwight Whorley, a Virginia man who was convicted in U.S. District Court of possessing actual kiddie porn. But, under what is known as the 2003 Protect Act, prosecutors also charged Whorley with possessing manga which depicted minors having explicit sex. From the relevant section of the Protect Act:
Any person who... knowingly possesses a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1) (A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B) is obscene; or
(2) (A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value... shall be subject to the penalties provided...
(c) Nonrequired Element of Offense.— It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist.
Threat Level also cites a similar conviction against Christopher Handley, a comic book collector who imported sexually explicit manga containing illustrations of child sex abuse and bestiality. Unlike Whorley, Handley possessed no actual child pornography.
So how does this connect to the RapeLay situation? A [NSFW] review of the game posted on Something Awful describes graphic, forced sex with a mother and her two minor daughters, the youngest of whom appears to be about ten years old. Save for the fact that it's interactive, RapeLay is not much different from the type of hardcore manga which earned federal time for Whorley and Handley.
We should note that a single judge on the 4th Circuit dissented from the opinion upholding Whorley's conviction and urged that the case be sent to the U.S. Supreme Court. But for now, at least, owning a copy of RapeLay seems like a risky legal proposition, indeed.
Full post as published by GamePolitics.com on June 19, 2009 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Missing Children
Databases and organizations
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Law & Order Depicts Police Procedures and Criminal Justice
Accuracy of Criminal Justice Depiction on Television
Recall of TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count Sold in The United States and Puerto Rico
TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count One Lot Recalled in US and Puerto Rico
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
Internet/Technology
involving cyber law, consumer protection, internet crime, internet fraud, online gambling, e-commerce.
Cilantro
Recalled in 5 States
Lettuce
Recalled in 29 States due to Salmonella
Salmonella Outbreak
50 People Sick in Five States

Yet Another Early Post-Heller Second Amendment Case:
FBI: Violent Crimes Down in 2007
State search warrant is evaluate for PC by state crime and Fourth Amendment
Pro Bono Defense in United States v. Lori Drew:








